Intel NUC vs Mac Mini: Which One Wins the Hearts of All

In the battle of compact PCs, both the Mac Mini and the Intel NUC are great devices, but which is better for your needs? We’ll compare the pros and cons of these two computers to find out which is best for you. Let’s get started!

Performance

First, let’s look at the processors, the Apple Mac mini has an Apple M1 chip, while the Intel NUC 11 of the same price has a quad-core Intel Core i5 chip. Both chips are powerful and capable of multitasking.

The differences between the two devices are largely in the graphics department. The Mac mini uses onboard graphics, while the NUC optional upgrade discrete GPUs.

Therefore, if you look for a machine that provides the right power and performance for your needs, the Mac mini’s onboard graphics may be adequate for everyday work, but the Mac mini is not ideal for professional video editing or gaming.

Upgradability

The NUC has other advantages over the Mac mini. For example, Mac mini has a memory that is integrated into the Apple M1 chip and can’t be upgraded. You can only configure the memory in your Mac mini when you purchase it.

In Intel’s Panther Canyon NUC, you’re restricted to just storage and RAM upgrades, but they’re very easy to do and don’t have rigid requirements on specs.

You get one M.2 PCIe SSD slot for SSD, and two SO-DIMM slots for RAM. You can enhance the NUC’s performance by installing up to 64GB of RAM across its two SO-DIMM slots.

The NUC is a better option for those who want a more flexible, customizable experience.

Portability

Next, let’s talk about portability. The Apple Mac mini has a distinctive flat shape, with neat edges and rounded corners. The distinctive flat shape could easily be placed on its side and stored wedged between books on a bookshelf.

While Apple’s Mac mini features a unique design, the Intel NUC is more straightforward and smaller. Because it requires less space, which makes it more versatile.

On the other hand, the Intel NUC 11 is just 4.6 inches wide and 2.0 inches tall (for the tall version), it can be easily placed on the table, and it is compact and compact, so you don’t have to worry about taking up a lot of space. If you don’t want to put it on the table, it can be attached to the back of the computer screen.

If you’re looking for a portable machine, the NUC has an advantage over the Mac.

Connectivity and Ports

When comparing the two, there is also a big difference between their ports.

The ‌M1‌ ‌Mac mini‌ features a decent number of ports, with two Thunderbolt, a single HDMI 2.0, two USB 3.0 Gen 1 (5Gbps) Type-A, 3.5mm headset jack, and gigabit ethernet (upgradable to 10Gb ethernet).

The NUC also offers more connectivity than the Mac Mini. Unlike the Mac Mini, it features one USB-A 3.0 port on the front and two on the back.

It also has two Thunderbolt 3 ports and a 3.5mm headset jack. Additionally, the NUC 11 also has a mini DisplayPort 1.4 ports and a microSD card reader.

The Panther Canyon NUC 11 also supports an I/O header that carries signals for two USB 3.0, Thunderbolt 2、HDMI、DVI, and VGA. In other words, if for some reason there are not already enough ports, you can expand their number.

External Display

When it comes to external displays, The ‌M1‌ ‌Mac mini‌ can support one display up to 6K and one display up to 4K, while the Intel ‌NUC 11 can support up to four 4K displays, or one 5K display and two 4K displays.

This means that to use a 6K display, you must choose the ‌M1‌ ‌Mac mini‌. However, if you want to use multiple 4K displays, you must have the Intel ‌NUC. You should therefore carefully consider their external display setup before deciding on either machine.

OS

In addition, we must keep in mind that, the Mac Mini uses MacOS and the Intel NUC is designed to use Windows.

Logically, macOS is the most advanced desktop operating system. Although the Windows 10 operating system is not the best, it is the most widely used.

Price

The price difference between the two machines also is the main factor in choosing which one is right for you.

Comparing the cost of both machines would be difficult, as it would have to be similar to hardware.

The Mac Mini comes in two standard configurations, with the Apple M1 chip version starting at $699 and the Intel Core i5 version starting at $899.

Since Intel NUC are so multiple versions, we can get configurations like the Mac Mini, with a Core i5 processor, 16 GB of RAM, and 512 GB SSD for about $750, with all the full equipment.

If you want to use it for everyday office work, both will provide you with everything you need without any problems, but Intel NUC will do it for you at a much lower price.

In addition to being cheaper, the NUC has many other benefits. A lot of users prefer its portability and small size.

Which one’s better?

For most people, an Intel NUC is the better option, but as always it will all depend on what you need.

While the Mac mini has more superior performance, the Intel NUC is a more versatile machine that has a more affordable price. If you’re looking for an all-purpose computer, the Intel NUC is a better choice.

However, if you plan on doing a lot of professional audio and video editing, the Apple Mac mini is the best option.

What is GEEK

Buddha Community

Intel NUC vs Mac Mini: Which One Wins the Hearts of All

In the battle of compact PCs, both the Mac Mini and the Intel NUC are great devices, but which is better for your needs? We’ll compare the pros and cons of these two computers to find out which is best for you. Let’s get started!

Performance

First, let’s look at the processors, the Apple Mac mini has an Apple M1 chip, while the Intel NUC 11 of the same price has a quad-core Intel Core i5 chip. Both chips are powerful and capable of multitasking.

The differences between the two devices are largely in the graphics department. The Mac mini uses onboard graphics, while the NUC optional upgrade discrete GPUs.

Therefore, if you look for a machine that provides the right power and performance for your needs, the Mac mini’s onboard graphics may be adequate for everyday work, but the Mac mini is not ideal for professional video editing or gaming.

Upgradability

The NUC has other advantages over the Mac mini. For example, Mac mini has a memory that is integrated into the Apple M1 chip and can’t be upgraded. You can only configure the memory in your Mac mini when you purchase it.

In Intel’s Panther Canyon NUC, you’re restricted to just storage and RAM upgrades, but they’re very easy to do and don’t have rigid requirements on specs.

You get one M.2 PCIe SSD slot for SSD, and two SO-DIMM slots for RAM. You can enhance the NUC’s performance by installing up to 64GB of RAM across its two SO-DIMM slots.

The NUC is a better option for those who want a more flexible, customizable experience.

Portability

Next, let’s talk about portability. The Apple Mac mini has a distinctive flat shape, with neat edges and rounded corners. The distinctive flat shape could easily be placed on its side and stored wedged between books on a bookshelf.

While Apple’s Mac mini features a unique design, the Intel NUC is more straightforward and smaller. Because it requires less space, which makes it more versatile.

On the other hand, the Intel NUC 11 is just 4.6 inches wide and 2.0 inches tall (for the tall version), it can be easily placed on the table, and it is compact and compact, so you don’t have to worry about taking up a lot of space. If you don’t want to put it on the table, it can be attached to the back of the computer screen.

If you’re looking for a portable machine, the NUC has an advantage over the Mac.

Connectivity and Ports

When comparing the two, there is also a big difference between their ports.

The ‌M1‌ ‌Mac mini‌ features a decent number of ports, with two Thunderbolt, a single HDMI 2.0, two USB 3.0 Gen 1 (5Gbps) Type-A, 3.5mm headset jack, and gigabit ethernet (upgradable to 10Gb ethernet).

The NUC also offers more connectivity than the Mac Mini. Unlike the Mac Mini, it features one USB-A 3.0 port on the front and two on the back.

It also has two Thunderbolt 3 ports and a 3.5mm headset jack. Additionally, the NUC 11 also has a mini DisplayPort 1.4 ports and a microSD card reader.

The Panther Canyon NUC 11 also supports an I/O header that carries signals for two USB 3.0, Thunderbolt 2、HDMI、DVI, and VGA. In other words, if for some reason there are not already enough ports, you can expand their number.

External Display

When it comes to external displays, The ‌M1‌ ‌Mac mini‌ can support one display up to 6K and one display up to 4K, while the Intel ‌NUC 11 can support up to four 4K displays, or one 5K display and two 4K displays.

This means that to use a 6K display, you must choose the ‌M1‌ ‌Mac mini‌. However, if you want to use multiple 4K displays, you must have the Intel ‌NUC. You should therefore carefully consider their external display setup before deciding on either machine.

OS

In addition, we must keep in mind that, the Mac Mini uses MacOS and the Intel NUC is designed to use Windows.

Logically, macOS is the most advanced desktop operating system. Although the Windows 10 operating system is not the best, it is the most widely used.

Price

The price difference between the two machines also is the main factor in choosing which one is right for you.

Comparing the cost of both machines would be difficult, as it would have to be similar to hardware.

The Mac Mini comes in two standard configurations, with the Apple M1 chip version starting at $699 and the Intel Core i5 version starting at $899.

Since Intel NUC are so multiple versions, we can get configurations like the Mac Mini, with a Core i5 processor, 16 GB of RAM, and 512 GB SSD for about $750, with all the full equipment.

If you want to use it for everyday office work, both will provide you with everything you need without any problems, but Intel NUC will do it for you at a much lower price.

In addition to being cheaper, the NUC has many other benefits. A lot of users prefer its portability and small size.

Which one’s better?

For most people, an Intel NUC is the better option, but as always it will all depend on what you need.

While the Mac mini has more superior performance, the Intel NUC is a more versatile machine that has a more affordable price. If you’re looking for an all-purpose computer, the Intel NUC is a better choice.

However, if you plan on doing a lot of professional audio and video editing, the Apple Mac mini is the best option.

Critical Intel Flaw Afflicts Several Motherboards, Server Systems, Compute Modules

Intel is warning of a rare critical-severity vulnerability affecting several of its motherboards, server systems and compute modules. The flaw could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to achieve escalated privileges.

The recently patched flaw (CVE-2020-8708) ranks 9.6 out of 10 on the CVSS scale, making it critical. Dmytro Oleksiuk, who discovered the flaw, told Threatpost that it exists in the firmware of Emulex Pilot 3. This baseboard-management controller is a service processor that monitors the physical state of a computer, network server or other hardware devices via specialized sensors.

Click to register!

Emulex Pilot 3 is used by various motherboards, which aggregate all the server components into one system. Also impacted are various server operating systems, and some Intel compute modules, which are electronic circuits, packaged onto a circuit board, that provide various functions.

The critical flaw stems from improper-authentication mechanisms in these Intel products before version 1.59.

In bypassing authentication, an attacker would be able to access to the KVM console of the server. The KVM console can access the system consoles of network devices to monitor and control their functionality. The KVM console is like a remote desktop implemented in the baseboard management controller – it provides an access point to the display, keyboard and mouse of the remote server, Oleksiuk told Threatpost.

The flaw is dangerous as it’s remotely exploitable, and attackers don’t need to be authenticated to exploit it – though they need to be located in the same network segment as the vulnerable server, Oleksiuk told Threatpost.

“The exploit is quite simple and very reliable because it’s a design flaw,” Oleksiuk told Threatpost.

Beyond this critical flaw, Intel also fixed bugs tied to 22 critical-, high-, medium- and low-severity CVEs affecting its server board, systems and compute modules. Other high-severity flaws include a heap-based overflow (CVE-2020-8730) that’s exploitable as an authenticated user; incorrect execution-assigned permissions in the file system (CVE-2020-8731); and a buffer overflow in daemon (CVE-2020-8707) — all three of which enable escalated privileges.

Click to enlarge.

Oleksiuk was credited with reporting CVE-2020-8708, as well as CVE-2020-8706, CVE-2020-8707. All other CVEs were found internally by Intel.

Affected server systems include: The R1000WT and R2000WT families, R1000SP, LSVRP and LR1304SP families and R1000WF and R2000WF families.

Impacted motherboards include: The S2600WT family, S2600CW family, S2600KP family, S2600TP family, S1200SP family, S2600WF family, S2600ST family and S2600BP family.

Finally, impacted compute modules include: The HNS2600KP family, HNS2600TP family and HNS2600BP family. More information regarding patches is available in Intel’s security advisory.

Intel also issued an array of other security advisories addressing high-severity flaws across its product lines, including ones that affect Intel Graphics Drivers, Intel’s RAID web console 3 for Windows, Intel Server Board M10JNP2SB and Intel NUCs.

#vulnerabilities #compute module #critical flaw #cve-2020-8708 #intel #intel critical flaw #intel flaw #intel motherboard #intel server board #patch #privilege escalation #security vulnerability #server system

How native is React Native? | React Native vs Native App Development

If you are undertaking a mobile app development for your start-up or enterprise, you are likely wondering whether to use React Native. As a popular development framework, React Native helps you to develop near-native mobile apps. However, you are probably also wondering how close you can get to a native app by using React Native. How native is React Native?

In the article, we discuss the similarities between native mobile development and development using React Native. We also touch upon where they differ and how to bridge the gaps. Read on.

A brief introduction to React Native

Let’s briefly set the context first. We will briefly touch upon what React Native is and how it differs from earlier hybrid frameworks.

React Native is a popular JavaScript framework that Facebook has created. You can use this open-source framework to code natively rendering Android and iOS mobile apps. You can use it to develop web apps too.

Facebook has developed React Native based on React, its JavaScript library. The first release of React Native came in March 2015. At the time of writing this article, the latest stable release of React Native is 0.62.0, and it was released in March 2020.

Although relatively new, React Native has acquired a high degree of popularity. The “Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2019” report identifies it as the 8th most loved framework. Facebook, Walmart, and Bloomberg are some of the top companies that use React Native.

The popularity of React Native comes from its advantages. Some of its advantages are as follows:

• Performance: It delivers optimal performance.
• Cross-platform development: You can develop both Android and iOS apps with it. The reuse of code expedites development and reduces costs.
• UI design: React Native enables you to design simple and responsive UI for your mobile app.
• 3rd party plugins: This framework supports 3rd party plugins.
• Developer community: A vibrant community of developers support React Native.

Why React Native is fundamentally different from earlier hybrid frameworks

Are you wondering whether React Native is just another of those hybrid frameworks like Ionic or Cordova? It’s not! React Native is fundamentally different from these earlier hybrid frameworks.

React Native is very close to native. Consider the following aspects as described on the React Native website:

• Access to many native platforms features: The primitives of React Native render to native platform UI. This means that your React Native app will use many native platform APIs as native apps would do.
• Near-native user experience: React Native provides several native components, and these are platform agnostic.
• The ease of accessing native APIs: React Native uses a declarative UI paradigm. This enables React Native to interact easily with native platform APIs since React Native wraps existing native code.

Due to these factors, React Native offers many more advantages compared to those earlier hybrid frameworks. We now review them.

#android app #frontend #ios app #mobile app development #benefits of react native #is react native good for mobile app development #native vs #pros and cons of react native #react mobile development #react native development #react native experience #react native framework #react native ios vs android #react native pros and cons #react native vs android #react native vs native #react native vs native performance #react vs native #why react native #why use react native

PWA vs Native App: Which Is Better Option In 2021?

Every year, the world is expanding with the launch of new smartphones and other gadgets available in the market. According to Statista, more than 50% of the population will be using smartphones by the end of 2021.

Hence, businesses worldwide have understood the importance of smartphones and are joining the mobile industry by launching native apps.

Apart from native apps, progressive web apps is another technology that is gaining a lot of attention among businesses. Moreover, various leading companies worldwide have openly accepted PWA and built progressive web apps.

Now, the question arises, how is PWA different from the native apps? Read More

#pwa vs native #pwa vs native app #progressive web app vs native #progressive web app vs native app #pwa vs native app performance

AWS v/s Google v/s Azure: Who will win the Cloud War?

In the midst of this pandemic, what is allowing us unprecedented flexibility in making faster technological advancements is the availability of various competent cloud computing systems. From delivering on-demand computing services for applications, processing and storage, now is the time to make the best use of public cloud providers. What’s more, with easy scalability there are no geographical restrictions either.

Machine Learning systems can be indefinitely supported by them as they are open-sourced and within reach now more than ever with increased affordability for businesses. In fact, public cloud providers are increasingly helpful in building Machine Learning models. So, the question that arises for us is – what are the possibilities for using them for deployment as well?

What do we mean by deployment?

Model building is very much like the process of designing any product. From ideation and data preparation to prototyping and testing. Deployment basically is the actionable point of the whole process, which means that we use the already trained model and make its predictions available to users or other systems in an automated, reproducible and auditable manner.

#cyber security #aws vs azure #google vs aws #google vs azure #google vs azure vs aws