Code reviews are an important part of software development. They can help a team to reinforce and follow standards and best practices, help developers to optimize their code, and prevent bad or bugged code from being released. Here are some tips for approaching code reviews in a way that is more effective, productive, and conducive to collaboration. Tips to improve code reviews and the code review process. Tips for Better Code Reviews
Code reviews are an important part of software development. They can help a team to reinforce and follow standards and best practices, help developers to optimize their code, and prevent bad or bugged code from being released. Here are some tips for approaching code reviews in a way that is more effective, productive, and conducive to collaboration.
It is important for a reviewer to understand what a code change is actually doing, how that area of the code relates to other parts of the code, and the impact the change will have on a program. Reviewing something without fully understanding it can lead to approvals being given despite there being issues in code. It can also lead to reviewers giving feedback that is not accurate or not as helpful as it could be. If a reviewer does not understand the context for a code change then it is important for them to either ask for context or to forward the change to a team member who does understand.
It is also important for a reviewer to give proper context in the comments they leave. For example, instead of telling someone to make a change, it can be helpful to tell someone why the change is necessary or how it would be beneficial. This helps a code author to get a better understanding of what the issue is and gives them insight into how to resolve an issue. It also could potentially give someone a better understanding of standards or best practices.
The story of Softagram is a long one and has many twists. Everything started in a small company long time ago, from the area of static analysis tools development. After many phases, Softagram is focusing on helping developers to get visual feedback on the code change: how is the software design evolving in the pull request under review.
Peer code reviews have increasingly been adopted by engineering teams around the world. Here are 6 tips to make the process better for teams.
Static code analysis is a method of debugging by examining source code before a program is run. It's done by analyzing a set of code against a set (or multiple sets) of coding rules. Static code analysis and static analysis are often used interchangeably, along with source code analysis.
Although we still talk about programming as a standalone career, the dominance of technology in our lives makes it clear that coding is much more than a career path. In my opinion, computer science is more than a college major or a high-paid job; it’s a skill, essential for thriving in a modern-day economy. Whether you work in healthcare, marketing, business, or other fields, you will see more coding and have to deal with a growing number of technologies throughout your entire life.
I remember my first fumble with basic on my ZX Spectrum computer back in the 1980s, ploughing through pages of basic commands and example code without any real idea of how I could write programs myself