Closing the Code Review Gap

Closing the Code Review Gap

Closing the Code Review Gap. Do you ever feel like it takes an eternity for your code reviewed. How can we make reviews faster? In an ideal world, we would branch, commit, review, pass the tests, gap and coding skills.

Do you ever feel like it takes an eternity for your code to be reviewed, and by the time it does get reviewed the code base has already moved on? Let’s explore how we might narrow that gap.

One of my frustrations as a developer is waiting for what can seem like forever to get my code reviewed and integrated into the build. I’ve heard many of my colleagues complain about the same issue too. Sometimes we have to chase people to review our code in order to authorize the merge, and other times the roles are reversed and we find ourselves being chased by those same people! Delayed code reviews hold up everything else down the line, such as acceptance testing, deployment and realization of value.

So how could we make code reviews more timely? Let’s look at a few options. But first, let’s start with a couple of assumptions. Let’s assume that these objectives are both good:

  1. Integrating new or revised code into the main line quickly and often.
  2. Preventing code from being integrated into the main line until that new code has been proven itself satisfactory. This would likely include passing both (A) a code review, and (B) automated criteria such as a test suite, code quality analysis, and so on.

agile agile-2 git code-review

Bootstrap 5 Complete Course with Examples

Bootstrap 5 Tutorial - Bootstrap 5 Crash Course for Beginners

Nest.JS Tutorial for Beginners

Hello Vue 3: A First Look at Vue 3 and the Composition API

Building a simple Applications with Vue 3

Deno Crash Course: Explore Deno and Create a full REST API with Deno

How to Build a Real-time Chat App with Deno and WebSockets

Convert HTML to Markdown Online

HTML entity encoder decoder Online

Effective Code Reviews: A Primer

Peer code reviews have increasingly been adopted by engineering teams around the world. Here are 6 tips to make the process better for teams.

Softagram - Making Code Reviews Humane

The story of Softagram is a long one and has many twists. Everything started in a small company long time ago, from the area of static analysis tools development. After many phases, Softagram is focusing on helping developers to get visual feedback on the code change: how is the software design evolving in the pull request under review.

Identifying Non-Functional Requirements (NFR) As Part of Your Agile Project Inception

Full workshop breakdown on how to identify non-functional requirements (NFR) as a part of an agile project inception, including preparation and execution tips.

Static Code Analysis: What It Is? How to Use It?

Static code analysis is a method of debugging by examining source code before a program is run. It's done by analyzing a set of code against a set (or multiple sets) of coding rules. Static code analysis and static analysis are often used interchangeably, along with source code analysis.

Kick-Off Your Agile Team With A Working Agreement Workshop

In this article, I will discuss how I adapted Avi’s original canvas to the needs of the teams I was coaching, elaborate on the different elements of a working agreement, and share with you a step-by-step guide to facilitating collaborative working agreement development workshops.