1646886626
Next.js and React are the two leading frontend frameworks for creating web applications today, so it’s no surprise that many developers are debating the merits of each one when creating their next application. If you’re trying to choose between the two, there are a number of key points you should consider before making your decision. This article will compare some of these points and help you decide which framework would be best suited to your project needs.
Read More in this Blog - The Ultimate Guide to the Frontend Battle of Next.js vs. React
What is Next.js?
Next.js is a framework for building React applications, developed by Zeit (formerly known as ZenHub). It aims to help developers build websites using React by making build times really fast and configuration really simple, among other goals. Despite being relatively new on the block (version 1 was released around October 2017), it has gained popularity very quickly with roughly 20k stars on GitHub. On top of that, there’s an active community of devs who use it and even more who are currently testing out its capabilities in real-world projects. Still confused? Maybe we can sort it out together! That’s what we’re going to try today: sorting through some of what makes both frameworks great and digging into how they compare with each other. Then you’ll be able to make an informed decision on which one might fit your project best! Read more...
What is React?
React is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces. It’s maintained by Facebook and a huge community of individual developers, making it popular as well as powerful. The main concept behind React is components: building UIs by composing small reusable pieces instead of writing out HTML tags manually or with helpers like jQuery code. In other words, you don’t have to learn another language; you simply create an HTML-like template for your view then use code to tell it how to behave. Like all libraries, React makes some assumptions about how you build your app that might not fit your needs—in that case it may be better to look at other options instead. Let's take a closer look at where React shines and where it could use some improvement.
Why would I choose one over the other?
When choosing between a technology, there’s usually a few reasons as to why you would make that decision. For example, maybe React is used by one of your coworkers at your day job and you want to get familiar with their work environment, or maybe you like how extensible it is thanks to third-party tools like GraphQL. You could also choose something else over either option because they both just seem like an unnecessary hassle. Whatever your reason for choosing them—or not—it’s good to have them documented somewhere where anyone who needs to know can easily look it up. Documenting these reasons can also prevent those same people from asking questions about why you chose what you did; if you were proactively writing down what led to your choice instead of relying on memory, then no one has any reason to question that choice anymore. The best thing about documenting all of these choices is that doing so helps ensure everyone knows exactly what everyone else is working with, which means less confusion overall!
Pros and Cons of Each
You’ve likely heard of React, which was created by Facebook and is now maintained by a large community of developers and companies. You may also be aware of its primary competitor: Next.js, which is created by Zeit and supported by a growing number of open-source developers. Both of these libraries have been around for several years and are used extensively on production websites. In fact, it’s possible that you use one or both yourself! However, many people aren’t sure how to choose between them when they evaluate different options for their own projects. To help with your decision making process, here are some key points to consider before selecting either of these frameworks.
Final Thoughts on which framework I prefer
Both React and Next.js are similar and both have their pros and cons, but what I found was they each solve different problems very well which is why they exist together. You should use whichever one solves your frontend needs best, but don’t be afraid to experiment with them both so you can choose which one will help you build better products faster than ever before! Hope that helps! See you on next.js and react next time...
Conclusion
It’s hard to pick a winner between these two frameworks because they each have their own perks and their own drawbacks. As of today, React still has more users and enjoys more stability than its competitor, Next.js does. However, while React focuses on being extremely flexible, that often comes at a cost — time investment is required to learn how to use it properly and there are definitely some performance issues when you try scaling it up. On top of that, JSX can be slightly confusing for developers who are unfamiliar with HTML syntax. In contrast, Next.js does require an easier setup process (the library just works!) but doesn’t make certain aspects as customizable as React does. The end result?
1598839687
If you are undertaking a mobile app development for your start-up or enterprise, you are likely wondering whether to use React Native. As a popular development framework, React Native helps you to develop near-native mobile apps. However, you are probably also wondering how close you can get to a native app by using React Native. How native is React Native?
In the article, we discuss the similarities between native mobile development and development using React Native. We also touch upon where they differ and how to bridge the gaps. Read on.
Let’s briefly set the context first. We will briefly touch upon what React Native is and how it differs from earlier hybrid frameworks.
React Native is a popular JavaScript framework that Facebook has created. You can use this open-source framework to code natively rendering Android and iOS mobile apps. You can use it to develop web apps too.
Facebook has developed React Native based on React, its JavaScript library. The first release of React Native came in March 2015. At the time of writing this article, the latest stable release of React Native is 0.62.0, and it was released in March 2020.
Although relatively new, React Native has acquired a high degree of popularity. The “Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2019” report identifies it as the 8th most loved framework. Facebook, Walmart, and Bloomberg are some of the top companies that use React Native.
The popularity of React Native comes from its advantages. Some of its advantages are as follows:
Are you wondering whether React Native is just another of those hybrid frameworks like Ionic or Cordova? It’s not! React Native is fundamentally different from these earlier hybrid frameworks.
React Native is very close to native. Consider the following aspects as described on the React Native website:
Due to these factors, React Native offers many more advantages compared to those earlier hybrid frameworks. We now review them.
#android app #frontend #ios app #mobile app development #benefits of react native #is react native good for mobile app development #native vs #pros and cons of react native #react mobile development #react native development #react native experience #react native framework #react native ios vs android #react native pros and cons #react native vs android #react native vs native #react native vs native performance #react vs native #why react native #why use react native
1621250665
Looking to hire dedicated top Reactjs developers at affordable prices? Our 5+ years of average experienced Reactjs developers comprise proficiency in delivering the most complex and challenging web apps.
Hire ReactJS developers online on a monthly, hourly, or full-time basis who are highly skilled & efficient in implementing new technologies and turn into business-driven applications while saving your cost up to 60%.
Planning to** outsource React web Development services from India** using Reactjs? Or would you like to hire a team of Reactjs developers? Get in touch for a free quote!
#hire react js developer #react.js developer #react.js developers #hire reactjs development company #react js development india #react js developer
1625674200
In this video, we are going to implement Google Analytics to our Next JS application. Tracking page views of an application is very important.
Google analytics will allow us to track analytics information.
Frontend: https://github.com/amitavroy/video-reviews
API: https://github.com/amitavdevzone/video-review-api
App link: https://video-reviews.vercel.app
You can find me on:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/amitavroy7
Discord: https://discord.gg/Em4nuvQk
#next js #js #react js #react #next #google analytics
1632537859
Not babashka. Node.js babashka!?
Ad-hoc CLJS scripting on Node.js.
Experimental. Please report issues here.
Nbb's main goal is to make it easy to get started with ad hoc CLJS scripting on Node.js.
Additional goals and features are:
Nbb requires Node.js v12 or newer.
CLJS code is evaluated through SCI, the same interpreter that powers babashka. Because SCI works with advanced compilation, the bundle size, especially when combined with other dependencies, is smaller than what you get with self-hosted CLJS. That makes startup faster. The trade-off is that execution is less performant and that only a subset of CLJS is available (e.g. no deftype, yet).
Install nbb
from NPM:
$ npm install nbb -g
Omit -g
for a local install.
Try out an expression:
$ nbb -e '(+ 1 2 3)'
6
And then install some other NPM libraries to use in the script. E.g.:
$ npm install csv-parse shelljs zx
Create a script which uses the NPM libraries:
(ns script
(:require ["csv-parse/lib/sync$default" :as csv-parse]
["fs" :as fs]
["path" :as path]
["shelljs$default" :as sh]
["term-size$default" :as term-size]
["zx$default" :as zx]
["zx$fs" :as zxfs]
[nbb.core :refer [*file*]]))
(prn (path/resolve "."))
(prn (term-size))
(println (count (str (fs/readFileSync *file*))))
(prn (sh/ls "."))
(prn (csv-parse "foo,bar"))
(prn (zxfs/existsSync *file*))
(zx/$ #js ["ls"])
Call the script:
$ nbb script.cljs
"/private/tmp/test-script"
#js {:columns 216, :rows 47}
510
#js ["node_modules" "package-lock.json" "package.json" "script.cljs"]
#js [#js ["foo" "bar"]]
true
$ ls
node_modules
package-lock.json
package.json
script.cljs
Nbb has first class support for macros: you can define them right inside your .cljs
file, like you are used to from JVM Clojure. Consider the plet
macro to make working with promises more palatable:
(defmacro plet
[bindings & body]
(let [binding-pairs (reverse (partition 2 bindings))
body (cons 'do body)]
(reduce (fn [body [sym expr]]
(let [expr (list '.resolve 'js/Promise expr)]
(list '.then expr (list 'clojure.core/fn (vector sym)
body))))
body
binding-pairs)))
Using this macro we can look async code more like sync code. Consider this puppeteer example:
(-> (.launch puppeteer)
(.then (fn [browser]
(-> (.newPage browser)
(.then (fn [page]
(-> (.goto page "https://clojure.org")
(.then #(.screenshot page #js{:path "screenshot.png"}))
(.catch #(js/console.log %))
(.then #(.close browser)))))))))
Using plet
this becomes:
(plet [browser (.launch puppeteer)
page (.newPage browser)
_ (.goto page "https://clojure.org")
_ (-> (.screenshot page #js{:path "screenshot.png"})
(.catch #(js/console.log %)))]
(.close browser))
See the puppeteer example for the full code.
Since v0.0.36, nbb includes promesa which is a library to deal with promises. The above plet
macro is similar to promesa.core/let
.
$ time nbb -e '(+ 1 2 3)'
6
nbb -e '(+ 1 2 3)' 0.17s user 0.02s system 109% cpu 0.168 total
The baseline startup time for a script is about 170ms seconds on my laptop. When invoked via npx
this adds another 300ms or so, so for faster startup, either use a globally installed nbb
or use $(npm bin)/nbb script.cljs
to bypass npx
.
Nbb does not depend on any NPM dependencies. All NPM libraries loaded by a script are resolved relative to that script. When using the Reagent module, React is resolved in the same way as any other NPM library.
To load .cljs
files from local paths or dependencies, you can use the --classpath
argument. The current dir is added to the classpath automatically. So if there is a file foo/bar.cljs
relative to your current dir, then you can load it via (:require [foo.bar :as fb])
. Note that nbb
uses the same naming conventions for namespaces and directories as other Clojure tools: foo-bar
in the namespace name becomes foo_bar
in the directory name.
To load dependencies from the Clojure ecosystem, you can use the Clojure CLI or babashka to download them and produce a classpath:
$ classpath="$(clojure -A:nbb -Spath -Sdeps '{:aliases {:nbb {:replace-deps {com.github.seancorfield/honeysql {:git/tag "v2.0.0-rc5" :git/sha "01c3a55"}}}}}')"
and then feed it to the --classpath
argument:
$ nbb --classpath "$classpath" -e "(require '[honey.sql :as sql]) (sql/format {:select :foo :from :bar :where [:= :baz 2]})"
["SELECT foo FROM bar WHERE baz = ?" 2]
Currently nbb
only reads from directories, not jar files, so you are encouraged to use git libs. Support for .jar
files will be added later.
The name of the file that is currently being executed is available via nbb.core/*file*
or on the metadata of vars:
(ns foo
(:require [nbb.core :refer [*file*]]))
(prn *file*) ;; "/private/tmp/foo.cljs"
(defn f [])
(prn (:file (meta #'f))) ;; "/private/tmp/foo.cljs"
Nbb includes reagent.core
which will be lazily loaded when required. You can use this together with ink to create a TUI application:
$ npm install ink
ink-demo.cljs
:
(ns ink-demo
(:require ["ink" :refer [render Text]]
[reagent.core :as r]))
(defonce state (r/atom 0))
(doseq [n (range 1 11)]
(js/setTimeout #(swap! state inc) (* n 500)))
(defn hello []
[:> Text {:color "green"} "Hello, world! " @state])
(render (r/as-element [hello]))
Working with callbacks and promises can become tedious. Since nbb v0.0.36 the promesa.core
namespace is included with the let
and do!
macros. An example:
(ns prom
(:require [promesa.core :as p]))
(defn sleep [ms]
(js/Promise.
(fn [resolve _]
(js/setTimeout resolve ms))))
(defn do-stuff
[]
(p/do!
(println "Doing stuff which takes a while")
(sleep 1000)
1))
(p/let [a (do-stuff)
b (inc a)
c (do-stuff)
d (+ b c)]
(prn d))
$ nbb prom.cljs
Doing stuff which takes a while
Doing stuff which takes a while
3
Also see API docs.
Since nbb v0.0.75 applied-science/js-interop is available:
(ns example
(:require [applied-science.js-interop :as j]))
(def o (j/lit {:a 1 :b 2 :c {:d 1}}))
(prn (j/select-keys o [:a :b])) ;; #js {:a 1, :b 2}
(prn (j/get-in o [:c :d])) ;; 1
Most of this library is supported in nbb, except the following:
:syms
.-x
notation. In nbb, you must use keywords.See the example of what is currently supported.
See the examples directory for small examples.
Also check out these projects built with nbb:
See API documentation.
See this gist on how to convert an nbb script or project to shadow-cljs.
Prequisites:
To build:
bb release
Run bb tasks
for more project-related tasks.
Download Details:
Author: borkdude
Download Link: Download The Source Code
Official Website: https://github.com/borkdude/nbb
License: EPL-1.0
#node #javascript
1615544450
Since March 2020 reached 556 million monthly downloads have increased, It shows that React JS has been steadily growing. React.js also provides a desirable amount of pliancy and efficiency for developing innovative solutions with interactive user interfaces. It’s no surprise that an increasing number of businesses are adopting this technology. How do you select and recruit React.js developers who will propel your project forward? How much does a React developer make? We’ll bring you here all the details you need.
Facebook built and maintains React.js, an open-source JavaScript library for designing development tools. React.js is used to create single-page applications (SPAs) that can be used in conjunction with React Native to develop native cross-platform apps.
In the United States, the average React developer salary is $94,205 a year, or $30-$48 per hour, This is one of the highest among JavaScript developers. The starting salary for junior React.js developers is $60,510 per year, rising to $112,480 for senior roles.
In context of software developer wage rates, the United States continues to lead. In high-tech cities like San Francisco and New York, average React developer salaries will hit $98K and $114per year, overall.
However, the need for React.js and React Native developer is outpacing local labour markets. As a result, many businesses have difficulty locating and recruiting them locally.
It’s no surprise that for US and European companies looking for professional and budget engineers, offshore regions like India are becoming especially interesting. This area has a large number of app development companies, a good rate with quality, and a good pool of React.js front-end developers.
As per Linkedin, the country’s IT industry employs over a million React specialists. Furthermore, for the same or less money than hiring a React.js programmer locally, you may recruit someone with much expertise and a broader technical stack.
React is a very strong framework. React.js makes use of a powerful synchronization method known as Virtual DOM, which compares the current page architecture to the expected page architecture and updates the appropriate components as long as the user input.
React is scalable. it utilises a single language, For server-client side, and mobile platform.
React is steady.React.js is completely adaptable, which means it seldom, if ever, updates the user interface. This enables legacy projects to be updated to the most new edition of React.js without having to change the codebase or make a few small changes.
React is adaptable. It can be conveniently paired with various state administrators (e.g., Redux, Flux, Alt or Reflux) and can be used to implement a number of architectural patterns.
Is there a market for React.js programmers?
The need for React.js developers is rising at an unparalleled rate. React.js is currently used by over one million websites around the world. React is used by Fortune 400+ businesses and popular companies such as Facebook, Twitter, Glassdoor and Cloudflare.
As you’ve seen, locating and Hire React js Developer and Hire React Native developer is a difficult challenge. You will have less challenges selecting the correct fit for your projects if you identify growing offshore locations (e.g. India) and take into consideration the details above.
If you want to make this process easier, You can visit our website for more, or else to write a email, we’ll help you to finding top rated React.js and React Native developers easier and with strives to create this operation
#hire-react-js-developer #hire-react-native-developer #react #react-native #react-js #hire-react-js-programmer