Understanding neural networks using Python and Numpy by coding

If you are a **junior data scientist** who sort of understands how neural nets work, or a **machine learning enthusiast** who only knows a little about **deep learning**, this is the article that you cannot miss. Here is **how you can build a neural net from scratch using NumPy** in ** 9 steps **— from data pre-processing to back-propagation — a must-do practice.

Basic understanding of **machine learning**, **artificial neural network**, **Python syntax**, and programming logic is preferred (but not necessary as you can learn on the go).

*Codes are available on **Github**.*

Step one. Import NumPy. Seriously.

import numpy as np np.random.seed(42) # for reproducibility

**Deep learning** is data-hungry. Although there are many clean datasets available online, we will generate our own for simplicity — for inputs **a** and **b**, we have outputs **a+b**, **a-b**, and **|a-b|**. 10,000 datum points are generated.

X_num_row, X_num_col = [2, 10000] # Row is no. of feature, col is no. of datum points X_raw = np.random.rand(X_num_row,X_num_col) * 100 y_raw = np.concatenate(([(X_raw[0,:] + X_raw[1,:])], [(X_raw[0,:] - X_raw[1,:])], np.abs([(X_raw[0,:] - X_raw[1,:])]))) # for input a and b, output is a+b; a-b and |a-b| y_num_row, y_num_col = y_raw.shape

Our dataset is split into training (70%) and testing (30%) set. Only training set is leveraged for tuning neural networks. Testing set is used only for performance evaluation when the training is complete.

train_ratio = 0.7 num_train_datum = int(train_ratio*X_num_col) X_raw_train = X_raw[:,0:num_train_datum] X_raw_test = X_raw[:,num_train_datum:] y_raw_train = y_raw[:,0:num_train_datum] y_raw_test = y_raw[:,num_train_datum:]

Data in the training set is standardized so that the distribution for each standardized feature is zero-mean and unit-variance. The scalers generated from the abovementioned procedure can then be applied to the testing set.

class scaler: def __init__(self, mean, std): self.mean = mean self.std = stddef get_scaler(row): mean = np.mean(row) std = np.std(row) return scaler(mean, std)

def standardize(data, scaler): return (data - scaler.mean) / scaler.std

def unstandardize(data, scaler): return (data * scaler.std) + scaler.mean

## Construct scalers from training set

X_scalers = [get_scaler(X_raw_train[row,:]) for row in range(X_num_row)] X_train = np.array([standardize(X_raw_train[row,:], X_scalers[row]) for row in range(X_num_row)])

y_scalers = [get_scaler(y_raw_train[row,:]) for row in range(y_num_row)] y_train = np.array([standardize(y_raw_train[row,:], y_scalers[row]) for row in range(y_num_row)])

## Apply those scalers to testing set

X_test = np.array([standardize(X_raw_test[row,:], X_scalers[row]) for row in range(X_num_row)]) y_test = np.array([standardize(y_raw_test[row,:], y_scalers[row]) for row in range(y_num_row)])

## Check if data has been standardized

print([X_train[row,:].mean() for row in range(X_num_row)]) # should be close to zero print([X_train[row,:].std() for row in range(X_num_row)]) # should be close to one

print([y_train[row,:].mean() for row in range(y_num_row)]) # should be close to zero print([y_train[row,:].std() for row in range(y_num_row)]) # should be close to one

The scaler therefore does not contain any information from our testing set. We do not want our neural net to gain any information regarding testing set before network tuning.

We have now completed the data pre-processing procedures in ** 4 steps**.

Photo by freestocks.org on Unsplash

We objectify a ‘layer’ using class in Python. Every layer (except the input layer) has a weight matrix **W**, a bias vector ** b**, and an activation function. Each layer is appended to a list called

class layer: definit(self, layer_index, is_output, input_dim, output_dim, activation): self.layer_index = layer_index # zero indicates input layer self.is_output = is_output # true indicates output layer, false otherwise self.input_dim = input_dim self.output_dim = output_dim self.activation = activation`# the multiplication constant is sorta arbitrary if layer_index != 0: self.W = np.random.randn(output_dim, input_dim) * np.sqrt(2/input_dim) self.b = np.random.randn(output_dim, 1) * np.sqrt(2/input_dim)`

## Change layers_dim to configure your own neural net!

layers_dim = [X_num_row, 4, 4, y_num_row] # input layer --- hidden layers --- output layers neural_net = []

## Construct the net layer by layer

for layer_index in range(len(layers_dim)): if layer_index == 0: # if input layer neural_net.append(layer(layer_index, False, 0, layers_dim[layer_index], 'irrelevant')) elif layer_index+1 == len(layers_dim): # if output layer neural_net.append(layer(layer_index, True, layers_dim[layer_index-1], layers_dim[layer_index], activation='linear')) else: neural_net.append(layer(layer_index, False, layers_dim[layer_index-1], layers_dim[layer_index], activation='relu'))

## Simple check on overfitting

pred_n_param = sum([(layers_dim[layer_index]+1)*layers_dim[layer_index+1] for layer_index in range(len(layers_dim)-1)]) act_n_param = sum([neural_net[layer_index].W.size + neural_net[layer_index].b.size for layer_index in range(1,len(layers_dim))]) print(f'Predicted number of hyperparameters: {pred_n_param}') print(f'Actual number of hyperparameters: {act_n_param}') print(f'Number of data: {X_num_col}')

if act_n_param >= X_num_col: raise Exception('It will overfit.')

Finally, we do a sanity check on the number of hyperparameters using the following formula, and by counting. The number of datums available should exceed the number of hyperparameters, otherwise it will definitely overfit.

N^l is number of hyperparameters at l-th layer, L is number of layers (excluding input layer)

We define a function for forward propagation given a certain set of weights and biases. The connection between layers is defined in matrix form as:

σ is element-wise activation function, superscript T means transpose of a matrix

Activation functions are defined one by one. ReLU is implemented as ** a → max(a,0)**, whereas sigmoid function should return

def activation(input_, act_func): if act_func == 'relu': return np.maximum(input_, np.zeros(input_.shape)) elif act_func == 'linear': return input_ else: raise Exception('Activation function is not defined.')def forward_prop(input_vec, layers_dim=layers_dim, neural_net=neural_net): neural_net[0].A = input_vec # Define A in input layer for for-loop convenience for layer_index in range(1,len(layers_dim)): # W,b,Z,A are undefined in input layer neural_net[layer_index].Z = np.add(np.dot(neural_net[layer_index].W, neural_net[layer_index-1].A), neural_net[layer_index].b) neural_net[layer_index].A = activation(neural_net[layer_index].Z, neural_net[layer_index].activation) return neural_net[layer_index].A

Photo by Holger Link on Unsplash

This is the most tricky part where many of us simply do not understand. Once we have defined a loss metric *e* for evaluating performance, we would like to know how the loss metric change when we perturb each weight or bias.

We want to know how sensitive each weight and bias is with respect to the loss metric.

This is represented by partial derivatives **∂e/∂W** (denoted dW in code) and **∂e/∂b** (denoted db in code) respectively, and can be calculated analytically.

⊙ represents element-wise multiplication

These back-propagation equations assume only one datum *y* is compared. The gradient update process would be very noisy as the performance of each iteration is subject to one datum point only. Multiple datums can be used to reduce the noise where **∂W(y 1, y2, …) **would be the mean of

def get_loss(y, y_hat, metric='mse'): if metric == 'mse': individual_loss = 0.5 * (y_hat - y) ** 2 return np.mean([np.linalg.norm(individual_loss[:,col], 2) for col in range(individual_loss.shape[1])]) else: raise Exception('Loss metric is not defined.')def get_dZ_from_loss(y, y_hat, metric): if metric == 'mse': return y_hat - y else: raise Exception('Loss metric is not defined.')

def get_dactivation(A, act_func): if act_func == 'relu': return np.maximum(np.sign(A), np.zeros(A.shape)) # 1 if backward input >0, 0 otherwise; then diaganolize elif act_func == 'linear': return np.ones(A.shape) else: raise Exception('Activation function is not defined.')

def backward_prop(y, y_hat, metric='mse', layers_dim=layers_dim, neural_net=neural_net, num_train_datum=num_train_datum): for layer_index in range(len(layers_dim)-1,0,-1): if layer_index+1 == len(layers_dim): # if output layer dZ = get_dZ_from_loss(y, y_hat, metric) else: dZ = np.multiply(np.dot(neural_net[layer_index+1].W.T, dZ), get_dactivation(neural_net[layer_index].A, neural_net[layer_index].activation)) dW = np.dot(dZ, neural_net[layer_index-1].A.T) / num_train_datum db = np.sum(dZ, axis=1, keepdims=True) / num_train_datum

`neural_net[layer_index].dW = dW neural_net[layer_index].db = db`

We now have every building block for training a neural network.

Once we know the sensitivities of weights and biases, we try to ** minimize** (hence the minus sign) the loss metric iteratively by gradient descent using the following update rule:

W = W - learning_rate * ∂W b = b - learning_rate * ∂b

Photo by Rostyslav Savchyn on Unsplash

learning_rate = 0.01 max_epoch = 1000000for epoch in range(1,max_epoch+1): y_hat_train = forward_prop(X_train) # update y_hat backward_prop(y_train, y_hat_train) # update (dW,db)

`for layer_index in range(1,len(layers_dim)): # update (W,b) neural_net[layer_index].W = neural_net[layer_index].W - learning_rate * neural_net[layer_index].dW neural_net[layer_index].b = neural_net[layer_index].b - learning_rate * neural_net[layer_index].db if epoch % 100000 == 0: print(f'{get_loss(y_train, y_hat_train):.4f}')`

Training loss should be going down as it iterates

The model generalizes well if the testing loss is not much higher than the training loss. We also make some test cases to see how the model performs.

# test lossprint(get_loss(y_test, forward_prop(X_test)))

def predict(X_raw_any): X_any = np.array([standardize(X_raw_any[row,:], X_scalers[row]) for row in range(X_num_row)]) y_hat = forward_prop(X_any) y_hat_any = np.array([unstandardize(y_hat[row,:], y_scalers[row]) for row in range(y_num_row)]) return y_hat_any

predict(np.array([[30,70],[70,30],[3,5],[888,122]]).T)

This is how you can build a neural net from scratch using NumPy in ** 9 steps**.

My implementation by no means is the most efficient way to build and train a neural net. There is so much room for improvement but that is a story for another day. Codes are available on Github. Happy coding!

**Thanks for reading** ❤

If you liked this post, share it with all of your programming buddies!

Follow us on **Facebook** | **Twitter**

☞ The Data Science Course 2019: Complete Data Science Bootcamp

☞ Machine Learning A-Z™: Hands-On Python & R In Data Science

☞ Tableau 10 A-Z: Hands-On Tableau Training For Data Science!

☞ R Programming A-Z™: R For Data Science With Real Exercises!

☞ Machine Learning, Data Science and Deep Learning with Python

All the basics to start using the Python library NumPy. In this course I'll cover the basics of using number and have several interactive course videos that will challenge you to learn how to use NumPy.

Python has been the go-to choice for Machine Learning, Data Science and Artificial Intelligence developers for a long time. Python libraries for modern machine learning models & projects: TensorFlow; Numpy; Scipy; Scikit-learn; Theano; Keras; PyTorch; Pandas; Matplotlib; ...

Complete hands-on Machine Learning tutorial with Data Science, Tensorflow, Artificial Intelligence, and Neural Networks. Introducing Tensorflow, Using Tensorflow, Introducing Keras, Using Keras, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), Learning Deep Learning, Machine Learning with Neural Networks, Deep Learning Tutorial with Python