Compare ScaleGrid MySQL vs. DigitalOcean Managed Databases - See which offers the best MySQL throughput, latency, and pricing on DigitalOcean across workloads.
HTML to Markdown
MySQL is the all-time number one open source database in the world, and a staple in RDBMS space. DigitalOcean is quickly building its reputation as the developers cloud by providing an affordable, flexible and easy to use cloud platform for developers to work with. MySQL on DigitalOcean is a natural fit, but what’s the best way to deploy your cloud database? In this post, we are going to compare the top two providers, DigitalOcean Managed Databases for MySQL vs. ScaleGrid MySQL hosting on DigitalOcean.
At a glance – TLDR ScaleGrid Blog - At a glance overview - 1st pointCompare Throughput ScaleGrid averages almost 40% higher throughput over DigitalOcean for MySQL, with up to 46% higher throughput in write-intensive workloads. Read now
ScaleGrid Blog - At a glance overview - 2nd pointCompare Latency On average, ScaleGrid achieves almost 30% lower latency over DigitalOcean for the same deployment configurations. Read now
ScaleGrid Blog - At a glance overview - 3rd pointCompare Pricing ScaleGrid provides 30% more storage on average vs. DigitalOcean for MySQL at the same affordable price. Read now
MySQL DigitalOcean Performance Benchmark In this benchmark, we compare equivalent plan sizes between ScaleGrid MySQL on DigitalOcean and DigitalOcean Managed Databases for MySQL. We are going to use a common, popular plan size using the below configurations for this performance benchmark:
Comparison Overview ScaleGridDigitalOceanInstance TypeMedium: 4 vCPUsMedium: 4 vCPUsMySQL Version18.104.22.168.20RAM8GB8GBSSD140GB115GBDeployment TypeStandaloneStandaloneRegionSF03SF03SupportIncludedBusiness-level support included with account sizes over $500/monthMonthly Price$120$120
As you can see above, ScaleGrid and DigitalOcean offer the same plan configurations across this plan size, apart from SSD where ScaleGrid provides over 20% more storage for the same price.
To ensure the most accurate results in our performance tests, we run the benchmark four times for each comparison to find the average performance across throughput and latency over read-intensive workloads, balanced workloads, and write-intensive workloads.
Throughput In this benchmark, we measure MySQL throughput in terms of queries per second (QPS) to measure our query efficiency. To quickly summarize the results, we display read-intensive, write-intensive and balanced workload averages below for 150 threads for ScaleGrid vs. DigitalOcean MySQL:
ScaleGrid MySQL vs DigitalOcean Managed Databases - Throughput Performance Graph
For the common 150 thread comparison, ScaleGrid averages almost 40% higher throughput over DigitalOcean for MySQL, with up to 46% higher throughput in write-intensive workloads.
cloud database developer digital ocean mysql performance scalegrid 95th percentile latency balanced workloads developers cloud digitalocean droplet digitalocean managed databases digitalocean performance digitalocean pricing higher throughput latency benchmark lower latency mysql benchmark setup mysql client threads mysql configuration mysql digitalocean mysql latency mysql on digitalocean mysql throughput performance benchmark queries per second read-intensive scalegrid mysql scalegrid vs. digitalocean throughput benchmark write-intensive
ScaleGrid announces support for their fully managed hosting plans on DigitalOcean for MySQL, PostgreSQL and Redis™. See how developers can improve performance. MySQL and PostgreSQL are the top two open source relational databases in the world, and Redis is the top key-value database
In this performance benchmark for MySQL on Azure, we put ScaleGrid up against Azure Database. See which provider gives you the most value for your money! Microsoft Azure is one of the most popular cloud providers in the world, and a natural fit for database hosting on applications leveraging Microsoft across their infrastructure. MySQL is the number one open source database that’s commonly hosted through Azure instances. While Microsoft offers their own Azure Database product, there are other alternatives available that may be able to help you improve your MySQL performance.
Mismanagement of multi-cloud expense costs an arm and leg to business and its management has become a major pain point. Here we break down some crucial tips to take some of the management challenges off your plate and help you optimize your cloud spend.
How MySQL Ripple binlog server can help you improve the performance of your master server by introducing a proxy server between the master and slave servers.MySQL does not limit the number of slaves that you can connect to the master server in a replication topology.
Compare PgBouncer vs. Pgpool-II to see which PostgreSQL connection pooler offers the best features, and analyze throughput (TPS) in a performance benchmark.