Marcelle  Smith

Marcelle Smith

1597061580

Introduction to API-First CMS with Directus' Open Source, Headless CMS

“Off with their heads!”

The frontend developers’ call to arms echoed throughout the realm. All across the Internet lands, monolithic, traditional CMS shivered.

Seriously though, we’re finally going to discuss API-first CMS—aka decoupled/headless CMS—on the blog.

From GitHub forks to email inquiries, we’ve noticed an increasing interest in “going headless” in general, but also for e-commerce purpose. So today, we’re going to:

  1. Discuss the whatwhy and when of API-first CMS.
  2. Show how to code a transactional web app with content managed in Directus, an open source headless CMS.

More specifically, I’ll explain how to build a lookbook using a full JAMstack: Metalsmith, Vue.js, Snipcart, and Directus. I’ll even throw in an open source code repo & live demo. :)

First, let’s try to understand how API-first CMS can add value to your workflow.

“API” still sound like a kind of beer to you? Read this smooth primer first.

What is an API-first, headless CMS? Why use one?

Like traditional content management systems, API-first CMS let users manage content through a web UI. So how do they differ?

API-first CMS allow developers to decouple content management from content rendering. A coupled CMS, like WordPress, takes care of both: content is stored in a backend database AND rendered in frontend templates using HTML/CSS. So the “head” that’s missing from a headless CMS is actually that final “presentation layer”:

Unlike a traditional CMS, an API-first CMS exposes its content data via a consumable API.

Your headless CMS isn’t concerned about how you choose to display content. It pushes raw content (e.g. JSON or XML) for you to fetch and display anywhere: mobile app, static site, web app, desktop app, IoT device… or all of these at once!

api-first-cms-headless-architecture

Headless CMS architecture

So why have they become popular? Why are companies like the NY Times, Lenovo, Spotify, Nike, Apple, Microsoft & New Relic using them?

Because the web has evolved! Frontend tooling & frameworks have exploded. Traditional CMS have become limited in how they display content and are prone to many security exploitsCross-platform content management has become essential to many projects. Static site generators have resurfaced, opening a content management gap API-first CMS could fill, saving non-technical folks from editing Markdown files.

We have many tools and channels to build digital experiences today.

With headless CMS, content can seamlessly follow different forms, not be limited by one.

API-first CMS: Benefits

  • Organizations save time & money: reduction of overhead for cross-platform content management.
  • Developers get more freedom: ditching CMS templates makes for authentic UX. Fewer worries about backend scalability and maintenance.
  • Content is future-proof: reduced impact of migrations & re-designs since content is decoupled from frontend.
  • In some cases, more performance: content is pre-baked and ready to be served.

API-first CMS make for a clear separation of concerns which enhances developer productivity. They foster a technology-agnostic approach to development that resonates with our own product’s values. If you’re interested, we have an in-depth tutorial on decoupling data with Vue.js in the frontend.

Drawbacks

Most potential drawbacks (supporting user permissions, multi-languages, etc.) have already been solved. Still, a few potential issues worth mentioning:

  • Might be overkill for a simple website project.
  • Might not provide responsive UI for on-the-go content management.
  • Might not support website tree architecture for content navigation.
  • Might be expensive for client budget.

#api #cms #api-first #headless cms #open -source

What is GEEK

Buddha Community

Introduction to API-First CMS with Directus' Open Source, Headless CMS
Marcelle  Smith

Marcelle Smith

1597061580

Introduction to API-First CMS with Directus' Open Source, Headless CMS

“Off with their heads!”

The frontend developers’ call to arms echoed throughout the realm. All across the Internet lands, monolithic, traditional CMS shivered.

Seriously though, we’re finally going to discuss API-first CMS—aka decoupled/headless CMS—on the blog.

From GitHub forks to email inquiries, we’ve noticed an increasing interest in “going headless” in general, but also for e-commerce purpose. So today, we’re going to:

  1. Discuss the whatwhy and when of API-first CMS.
  2. Show how to code a transactional web app with content managed in Directus, an open source headless CMS.

More specifically, I’ll explain how to build a lookbook using a full JAMstack: Metalsmith, Vue.js, Snipcart, and Directus. I’ll even throw in an open source code repo & live demo. :)

First, let’s try to understand how API-first CMS can add value to your workflow.

“API” still sound like a kind of beer to you? Read this smooth primer first.

What is an API-first, headless CMS? Why use one?

Like traditional content management systems, API-first CMS let users manage content through a web UI. So how do they differ?

API-first CMS allow developers to decouple content management from content rendering. A coupled CMS, like WordPress, takes care of both: content is stored in a backend database AND rendered in frontend templates using HTML/CSS. So the “head” that’s missing from a headless CMS is actually that final “presentation layer”:

Unlike a traditional CMS, an API-first CMS exposes its content data via a consumable API.

Your headless CMS isn’t concerned about how you choose to display content. It pushes raw content (e.g. JSON or XML) for you to fetch and display anywhere: mobile app, static site, web app, desktop app, IoT device… or all of these at once!

api-first-cms-headless-architecture

Headless CMS architecture

So why have they become popular? Why are companies like the NY Times, Lenovo, Spotify, Nike, Apple, Microsoft & New Relic using them?

Because the web has evolved! Frontend tooling & frameworks have exploded. Traditional CMS have become limited in how they display content and are prone to many security exploitsCross-platform content management has become essential to many projects. Static site generators have resurfaced, opening a content management gap API-first CMS could fill, saving non-technical folks from editing Markdown files.

We have many tools and channels to build digital experiences today.

With headless CMS, content can seamlessly follow different forms, not be limited by one.

API-first CMS: Benefits

  • Organizations save time & money: reduction of overhead for cross-platform content management.
  • Developers get more freedom: ditching CMS templates makes for authentic UX. Fewer worries about backend scalability and maintenance.
  • Content is future-proof: reduced impact of migrations & re-designs since content is decoupled from frontend.
  • In some cases, more performance: content is pre-baked and ready to be served.

API-first CMS make for a clear separation of concerns which enhances developer productivity. They foster a technology-agnostic approach to development that resonates with our own product’s values. If you’re interested, we have an in-depth tutorial on decoupling data with Vue.js in the frontend.

Drawbacks

Most potential drawbacks (supporting user permissions, multi-languages, etc.) have already been solved. Still, a few potential issues worth mentioning:

  • Might be overkill for a simple website project.
  • Might not provide responsive UI for on-the-go content management.
  • Might not support website tree architecture for content navigation.
  • Might be expensive for client budget.

#api #cms #api-first #headless cms #open -source

An API-First Approach For Designing Restful APIs | Hacker Noon

I’ve been working with Restful APIs for some time now and one thing that I love to do is to talk about APIs.

So, today I will show you how to build an API using the API-First approach and Design First with OpenAPI Specification.

First thing first, if you don’t know what’s an API-First approach means, it would be nice you stop reading this and check the blog post that I wrote to the Farfetchs blog where I explain everything that you need to know to start an API using API-First.

Preparing the ground

Before you get your hands dirty, let’s prepare the ground and understand the use case that will be developed.

Tools

If you desire to reproduce the examples that will be shown here, you will need some of those items below.

  • NodeJS
  • OpenAPI Specification
  • Text Editor (I’ll use VSCode)
  • Command Line

Use Case

To keep easy to understand, let’s use the Todo List App, it is a very common concept beyond the software development community.

#api #rest-api #openai #api-first-development #api-design #apis #restful-apis #restful-api

Top 10 API Security Threats Every API Team Should Know

As more and more data is exposed via APIs either as API-first companies or for the explosion of single page apps/JAMStack, API security can no longer be an afterthought. The hard part about APIs is that it provides direct access to large amounts of data while bypassing browser precautions. Instead of worrying about SQL injection and XSS issues, you should be concerned about the bad actor who was able to paginate through all your customer records and their data.

Typical prevention mechanisms like Captchas and browser fingerprinting won’t work since APIs by design need to handle a very large number of API accesses even by a single customer. So where do you start? The first thing is to put yourself in the shoes of a hacker and then instrument your APIs to detect and block common attacks along with unknown unknowns for zero-day exploits. Some of these are on the OWASP Security API list, but not all.

Insecure pagination and resource limits

Most APIs provide access to resources that are lists of entities such as /users or /widgets. A client such as a browser would typically filter and paginate through this list to limit the number items returned to a client like so:

First Call: GET /items?skip=0&take=10 
Second Call: GET /items?skip=10&take=10

However, if that entity has any PII or other information, then a hacker could scrape that endpoint to get a dump of all entities in your database. This could be most dangerous if those entities accidently exposed PII or other sensitive information, but could also be dangerous in providing competitors or others with adoption and usage stats for your business or provide scammers with a way to get large email lists. See how Venmo data was scraped

A naive protection mechanism would be to check the take count and throw an error if greater than 100 or 1000. The problem with this is two-fold:

  1. For data APIs, legitimate customers may need to fetch and sync a large number of records such as via cron jobs. Artificially small pagination limits can force your API to be very chatty decreasing overall throughput. Max limits are to ensure memory and scalability requirements are met (and prevent certain DDoS attacks), not to guarantee security.
  2. This offers zero protection to a hacker that writes a simple script that sleeps a random delay between repeated accesses.
skip = 0
while True:    response = requests.post('https://api.acmeinc.com/widgets?take=10&skip=' + skip),                      headers={'Authorization': 'Bearer' + ' ' + sys.argv[1]})    print("Fetched 10 items")    sleep(randint(100,1000))    skip += 10

How to secure against pagination attacks

To secure against pagination attacks, you should track how many items of a single resource are accessed within a certain time period for each user or API key rather than just at the request level. By tracking API resource access at the user level, you can block a user or API key once they hit a threshold such as “touched 1,000,000 items in a one hour period”. This is dependent on your API use case and can even be dependent on their subscription with you. Like a Captcha, this can slow down the speed that a hacker can exploit your API, like a Captcha if they have to create a new user account manually to create a new API key.

Insecure API key generation

Most APIs are protected by some sort of API key or JWT (JSON Web Token). This provides a natural way to track and protect your API as API security tools can detect abnormal API behavior and block access to an API key automatically. However, hackers will want to outsmart these mechanisms by generating and using a large pool of API keys from a large number of users just like a web hacker would use a large pool of IP addresses to circumvent DDoS protection.

How to secure against API key pools

The easiest way to secure against these types of attacks is by requiring a human to sign up for your service and generate API keys. Bot traffic can be prevented with things like Captcha and 2-Factor Authentication. Unless there is a legitimate business case, new users who sign up for your service should not have the ability to generate API keys programmatically. Instead, only trusted customers should have the ability to generate API keys programmatically. Go one step further and ensure any anomaly detection for abnormal behavior is done at the user and account level, not just for each API key.

Accidental key exposure

APIs are used in a way that increases the probability credentials are leaked:

  1. APIs are expected to be accessed over indefinite time periods, which increases the probability that a hacker obtains a valid API key that’s not expired. You save that API key in a server environment variable and forget about it. This is a drastic contrast to a user logging into an interactive website where the session expires after a short duration.
  2. The consumer of an API has direct access to the credentials such as when debugging via Postman or CURL. It only takes a single developer to accidently copy/pastes the CURL command containing the API key into a public forum like in GitHub Issues or Stack Overflow.
  3. API keys are usually bearer tokens without requiring any other identifying information. APIs cannot leverage things like one-time use tokens or 2-factor authentication.

If a key is exposed due to user error, one may think you as the API provider has any blame. However, security is all about reducing surface area and risk. Treat your customer data as if it’s your own and help them by adding guards that prevent accidental key exposure.

How to prevent accidental key exposure

The easiest way to prevent key exposure is by leveraging two tokens rather than one. A refresh token is stored as an environment variable and can only be used to generate short lived access tokens. Unlike the refresh token, these short lived tokens can access the resources, but are time limited such as in hours or days.

The customer will store the refresh token with other API keys. Then your SDK will generate access tokens on SDK init or when the last access token expires. If a CURL command gets pasted into a GitHub issue, then a hacker would need to use it within hours reducing the attack vector (unless it was the actual refresh token which is low probability)

Exposure to DDoS attacks

APIs open up entirely new business models where customers can access your API platform programmatically. However, this can make DDoS protection tricky. Most DDoS protection is designed to absorb and reject a large number of requests from bad actors during DDoS attacks but still need to let the good ones through. This requires fingerprinting the HTTP requests to check against what looks like bot traffic. This is much harder for API products as all traffic looks like bot traffic and is not coming from a browser where things like cookies are present.

Stopping DDoS attacks

The magical part about APIs is almost every access requires an API Key. If a request doesn’t have an API key, you can automatically reject it which is lightweight on your servers (Ensure authentication is short circuited very early before later middleware like request JSON parsing). So then how do you handle authenticated requests? The easiest is to leverage rate limit counters for each API key such as to handle X requests per minute and reject those above the threshold with a 429 HTTP response. There are a variety of algorithms to do this such as leaky bucket and fixed window counters.

Incorrect server security

APIs are no different than web servers when it comes to good server hygiene. Data can be leaked due to misconfigured SSL certificate or allowing non-HTTPS traffic. For modern applications, there is very little reason to accept non-HTTPS requests, but a customer could mistakenly issue a non HTTP request from their application or CURL exposing the API key. APIs do not have the protection of a browser so things like HSTS or redirect to HTTPS offer no protection.

How to ensure proper SSL

Test your SSL implementation over at Qualys SSL Test or similar tool. You should also block all non-HTTP requests which can be done within your load balancer. You should also remove any HTTP headers scrub any error messages that leak implementation details. If your API is used only by your own apps or can only be accessed server-side, then review Authoritative guide to Cross-Origin Resource Sharing for REST APIs

Incorrect caching headers

APIs provide access to dynamic data that’s scoped to each API key. Any caching implementation should have the ability to scope to an API key to prevent cross-pollution. Even if you don’t cache anything in your infrastructure, you could expose your customers to security holes. If a customer with a proxy server was using multiple API keys such as one for development and one for production, then they could see cross-pollinated data.

#api management #api security #api best practices #api providers #security analytics #api management policies #api access tokens #api access #api security risks #api access keys

Autumn  Blick

Autumn Blick

1601381326

Public ASX100 APIs: The Essential List

We’ve conducted some initial research into the public APIs of the ASX100 because we regularly have conversations about what others are doing with their APIs and what best practices look like. Being able to point to good local examples and explain what is happening in Australia is a key part of this conversation.

Method

The method used for this initial research was to obtain a list of the ASX100 (as of 18 September 2020). Then work through each company looking at the following:

  1. Whether the company had a public API: this was found by googling “[company name] API” and “[company name] API developer” and “[company name] developer portal”. Sometimes the company’s website was navigated or searched.
  2. Some data points about the API were noted, such as the URL of the portal/documentation and the method they used to publish the API (portal, documentation, web page).
  3. Observations were recorded that piqued the interest of the researchers (you will find these below).
  4. Other notes were made to support future research.
  5. You will find a summary of the data in the infographic below.

Data

With regards to how the APIs are shared:

#api #api-development #api-analytics #apis #api-integration #api-testing #api-security #api-gateway

Autumn  Blick

Autumn Blick

1602851580

54% of Developers Cite Lack of Documentation as the Top Obstacle to Consuming APIs

Recently, I worked with my team at Postman to field the 2020 State of the API survey and report. We’re insanely grateful to the folks who participated—more than 13,500 developers and other professionals took the survey, helping make this the largest and most comprehensive survey in the industry. (Seriously folks, thank you!) Curious what we learned? Here are a few insights in areas that you might find interesting:

API Reliability

Whether internal, external, or partner, APIs are perceived as reliable—more than half of respondents stated that APIs do not break, stop working, or materially change specification often enough to matter. Respondents choosing the “not often enough to matter” option here came in at 55.8% for internal APIs, 60.4% for external APIs, and 61.2% for partner APIs.

Obstacles to Producing APIs

When asked about the biggest obstacles to producing APIs, lack of time is by far the leading obstacle, with 52.3% of respondents listing it. Lack of knowledge (36.4%) and people (35.1%) were the next highest.

#api #rest-api #apis #api-first-development #api-report #api-documentation #api-reliability #hackernoon-top-story