1596040860
Disclaimer: I am the developer behind Model Zoo, a model deployment platform focused on ease-of-use.
Try our tool at
If you’re an AWS customer that needs to deploy machine learning models for real-time inference, you might have considered using AWS SageMaker Inference Endpoints. However, there is another option for model deployment that is sometimes overlooked: deploying directly on AWS Lambda. Although it comes with some caveats, the simplicity and cost-efficiency of Lambda make it worthwhile to consider over SageMaker endpoints for model deployment, especially when using scikit-learn, xgboost, or spaCy. In this article, we’ll go over some of the benefits and caveats of using AWS Lambda for ML inference and dive into some relevant benchmarks. We show that in scenarios of low usage (<2M predictions per month), you can save up to **95% on infrastructure costs **when moving models from SageMaker to Lambda. We’ll also present scikit-learn-lambda, our open-source toolkit for easily deploying scikit-learn on AWS Lambda.
AWS infrastructure diagram for realtime ML inference via SageMaker endpoints
SageMaker inference endpoints are one of many pieces of an impressive end-to-end machine learning toolkit offered by AWS, from data labeling (AWS SageMaker Ground Truth) to model monitoring (AWS SageMaker Model Monitor). SageMaker inference endpoints offer features around GPU acceleration, autoscaling, AB testing, integration with training pipelines, and integration with offline scoring (AWS Batch Transform). These features come at a steep cost — the cheapest possible inference endpoint (ml.t2.medium) will run you $50/month to run 24/7. The next best endpoint (ml.t2.xlarge) is $189.65/month.
AWS Lambda is a generic serverless computing platform
AWS Lambda is a pioneer of the serverless computing movement, letting you run arbitrary functions without provisioning or managing servers. It executes your code only when needed and scales automatically, from a few requests per day to hundreds per second. Lambda is a generic function execution engine without any machine learning specific features. It has inspired a growing community of tooling, some from AWS themselves (Serverless Application Model) and some externally affiliated (Serverless framework).
#scikit-learn #mlops #machine-learning #sagemaker #lambda #deep learning
1667425440
Perl script converts PDF files to Gerber format
Pdf2Gerb generates Gerber 274X photoplotting and Excellon drill files from PDFs of a PCB. Up to three PDFs are used: the top copper layer, the bottom copper layer (for 2-sided PCBs), and an optional silk screen layer. The PDFs can be created directly from any PDF drawing software, or a PDF print driver can be used to capture the Print output if the drawing software does not directly support output to PDF.
The general workflow is as follows:
Please note that Pdf2Gerb does NOT perform DRC (Design Rule Checks), as these will vary according to individual PCB manufacturer conventions and capabilities. Also note that Pdf2Gerb is not perfect, so the output files must always be checked before submitting them. As of version 1.6, Pdf2Gerb supports most PCB elements, such as round and square pads, round holes, traces, SMD pads, ground planes, no-fill areas, and panelization. However, because it interprets the graphical output of a Print function, there are limitations in what it can recognize (or there may be bugs).
See docs/Pdf2Gerb.pdf for install/setup, config, usage, and other info.
#Pdf2Gerb config settings:
#Put this file in same folder/directory as pdf2gerb.pl itself (global settings),
#or copy to another folder/directory with PDFs if you want PCB-specific settings.
#There is only one user of this file, so we don't need a custom package or namespace.
#NOTE: all constants defined in here will be added to main namespace.
#package pdf2gerb_cfg;
use strict; #trap undef vars (easier debug)
use warnings; #other useful info (easier debug)
##############################################################################################
#configurable settings:
#change values here instead of in main pfg2gerb.pl file
use constant WANT_COLORS => ($^O !~ m/Win/); #ANSI colors no worky on Windows? this must be set < first DebugPrint() call
#just a little warning; set realistic expectations:
#DebugPrint("${\(CYAN)}Pdf2Gerb.pl ${\(VERSION)}, $^O O/S\n${\(YELLOW)}${\(BOLD)}${\(ITALIC)}This is EXPERIMENTAL software. \nGerber files MAY CONTAIN ERRORS. Please CHECK them before fabrication!${\(RESET)}", 0); #if WANT_DEBUG
use constant METRIC => FALSE; #set to TRUE for metric units (only affect final numbers in output files, not internal arithmetic)
use constant APERTURE_LIMIT => 0; #34; #max #apertures to use; generate warnings if too many apertures are used (0 to not check)
use constant DRILL_FMT => '2.4'; #'2.3'; #'2.4' is the default for PCB fab; change to '2.3' for CNC
use constant WANT_DEBUG => 0; #10; #level of debug wanted; higher == more, lower == less, 0 == none
use constant GERBER_DEBUG => 0; #level of debug to include in Gerber file; DON'T USE FOR FABRICATION
use constant WANT_STREAMS => FALSE; #TRUE; #save decompressed streams to files (for debug)
use constant WANT_ALLINPUT => FALSE; #TRUE; #save entire input stream (for debug ONLY)
#DebugPrint(sprintf("${\(CYAN)}DEBUG: stdout %d, gerber %d, want streams? %d, all input? %d, O/S: $^O, Perl: $]${\(RESET)}\n", WANT_DEBUG, GERBER_DEBUG, WANT_STREAMS, WANT_ALLINPUT), 1);
#DebugPrint(sprintf("max int = %d, min int = %d\n", MAXINT, MININT), 1);
#define standard trace and pad sizes to reduce scaling or PDF rendering errors:
#This avoids weird aperture settings and replaces them with more standardized values.
#(I'm not sure how photoplotters handle strange sizes).
#Fewer choices here gives more accurate mapping in the final Gerber files.
#units are in inches
use constant TOOL_SIZES => #add more as desired
(
#round or square pads (> 0) and drills (< 0):
.010, -.001, #tiny pads for SMD; dummy drill size (too small for practical use, but needed so StandardTool will use this entry)
.031, -.014, #used for vias
.041, -.020, #smallest non-filled plated hole
.051, -.025,
.056, -.029, #useful for IC pins
.070, -.033,
.075, -.040, #heavier leads
# .090, -.043, #NOTE: 600 dpi is not high enough resolution to reliably distinguish between .043" and .046", so choose 1 of the 2 here
.100, -.046,
.115, -.052,
.130, -.061,
.140, -.067,
.150, -.079,
.175, -.088,
.190, -.093,
.200, -.100,
.220, -.110,
.160, -.125, #useful for mounting holes
#some additional pad sizes without holes (repeat a previous hole size if you just want the pad size):
.090, -.040, #want a .090 pad option, but use dummy hole size
.065, -.040, #.065 x .065 rect pad
.035, -.040, #.035 x .065 rect pad
#traces:
.001, #too thin for real traces; use only for board outlines
.006, #minimum real trace width; mainly used for text
.008, #mainly used for mid-sized text, not traces
.010, #minimum recommended trace width for low-current signals
.012,
.015, #moderate low-voltage current
.020, #heavier trace for power, ground (even if a lighter one is adequate)
.025,
.030, #heavy-current traces; be careful with these ones!
.040,
.050,
.060,
.080,
.100,
.120,
);
#Areas larger than the values below will be filled with parallel lines:
#This cuts down on the number of aperture sizes used.
#Set to 0 to always use an aperture or drill, regardless of size.
use constant { MAX_APERTURE => max((TOOL_SIZES)) + .004, MAX_DRILL => -min((TOOL_SIZES)) + .004 }; #max aperture and drill sizes (plus a little tolerance)
#DebugPrint(sprintf("using %d standard tool sizes: %s, max aper %.3f, max drill %.3f\n", scalar((TOOL_SIZES)), join(", ", (TOOL_SIZES)), MAX_APERTURE, MAX_DRILL), 1);
#NOTE: Compare the PDF to the original CAD file to check the accuracy of the PDF rendering and parsing!
#for example, the CAD software I used generated the following circles for holes:
#CAD hole size: parsed PDF diameter: error:
# .014 .016 +.002
# .020 .02267 +.00267
# .025 .026 +.001
# .029 .03167 +.00267
# .033 .036 +.003
# .040 .04267 +.00267
#This was usually ~ .002" - .003" too big compared to the hole as displayed in the CAD software.
#To compensate for PDF rendering errors (either during CAD Print function or PDF parsing logic), adjust the values below as needed.
#units are pixels; for example, a value of 2.4 at 600 dpi = .0004 inch, 2 at 600 dpi = .0033"
use constant
{
HOLE_ADJUST => -0.004 * 600, #-2.6, #holes seemed to be slightly oversized (by .002" - .004"), so shrink them a little
RNDPAD_ADJUST => -0.003 * 600, #-2, #-2.4, #round pads seemed to be slightly oversized, so shrink them a little
SQRPAD_ADJUST => +0.001 * 600, #+.5, #square pads are sometimes too small by .00067, so bump them up a little
RECTPAD_ADJUST => 0, #(pixels) rectangular pads seem to be okay? (not tested much)
TRACE_ADJUST => 0, #(pixels) traces seemed to be okay?
REDUCE_TOLERANCE => .001, #(inches) allow this much variation when reducing circles and rects
};
#Also, my CAD's Print function or the PDF print driver I used was a little off for circles, so define some additional adjustment values here:
#Values are added to X/Y coordinates; units are pixels; for example, a value of 1 at 600 dpi would be ~= .002 inch
use constant
{
CIRCLE_ADJUST_MINX => 0,
CIRCLE_ADJUST_MINY => -0.001 * 600, #-1, #circles were a little too high, so nudge them a little lower
CIRCLE_ADJUST_MAXX => +0.001 * 600, #+1, #circles were a little too far to the left, so nudge them a little to the right
CIRCLE_ADJUST_MAXY => 0,
SUBST_CIRCLE_CLIPRECT => FALSE, #generate circle and substitute for clip rects (to compensate for the way some CAD software draws circles)
WANT_CLIPRECT => TRUE, #FALSE, #AI doesn't need clip rect at all? should be on normally?
RECT_COMPLETION => FALSE, #TRUE, #fill in 4th side of rect when 3 sides found
};
#allow .012 clearance around pads for solder mask:
#This value effectively adjusts pad sizes in the TOOL_SIZES list above (only for solder mask layers).
use constant SOLDER_MARGIN => +.012; #units are inches
#line join/cap styles:
use constant
{
CAP_NONE => 0, #butt (none); line is exact length
CAP_ROUND => 1, #round cap/join; line overhangs by a semi-circle at either end
CAP_SQUARE => 2, #square cap/join; line overhangs by a half square on either end
CAP_OVERRIDE => FALSE, #cap style overrides drawing logic
};
#number of elements in each shape type:
use constant
{
RECT_SHAPELEN => 6, #x0, y0, x1, y1, count, "rect" (start, end corners)
LINE_SHAPELEN => 6, #x0, y0, x1, y1, count, "line" (line seg)
CURVE_SHAPELEN => 10, #xstart, ystart, x0, y0, x1, y1, xend, yend, count, "curve" (bezier 2 points)
CIRCLE_SHAPELEN => 5, #x, y, 5, count, "circle" (center + radius)
};
#const my %SHAPELEN =
#Readonly my %SHAPELEN =>
our %SHAPELEN =
(
rect => RECT_SHAPELEN,
line => LINE_SHAPELEN,
curve => CURVE_SHAPELEN,
circle => CIRCLE_SHAPELEN,
);
#panelization:
#This will repeat the entire body the number of times indicated along the X or Y axes (files grow accordingly).
#Display elements that overhang PCB boundary can be squashed or left as-is (typically text or other silk screen markings).
#Set "overhangs" TRUE to allow overhangs, FALSE to truncate them.
#xpad and ypad allow margins to be added around outer edge of panelized PCB.
use constant PANELIZE => {'x' => 1, 'y' => 1, 'xpad' => 0, 'ypad' => 0, 'overhangs' => TRUE}; #number of times to repeat in X and Y directions
# Set this to 1 if you need TurboCAD support.
#$turboCAD = FALSE; #is this still needed as an option?
#CIRCAD pad generation uses an appropriate aperture, then moves it (stroke) "a little" - we use this to find pads and distinguish them from PCB holes.
use constant PAD_STROKE => 0.3; #0.0005 * 600; #units are pixels
#convert very short traces to pads or holes:
use constant TRACE_MINLEN => .001; #units are inches
#use constant ALWAYS_XY => TRUE; #FALSE; #force XY even if X or Y doesn't change; NOTE: needs to be TRUE for all pads to show in FlatCAM and ViewPlot
use constant REMOVE_POLARITY => FALSE; #TRUE; #set to remove subtractive (negative) polarity; NOTE: must be FALSE for ground planes
#PDF uses "points", each point = 1/72 inch
#combined with a PDF scale factor of .12, this gives 600 dpi resolution (1/72 * .12 = 600 dpi)
use constant INCHES_PER_POINT => 1/72; #0.0138888889; #multiply point-size by this to get inches
# The precision used when computing a bezier curve. Higher numbers are more precise but slower (and generate larger files).
#$bezierPrecision = 100;
use constant BEZIER_PRECISION => 36; #100; #use const; reduced for faster rendering (mainly used for silk screen and thermal pads)
# Ground planes and silk screen or larger copper rectangles or circles are filled line-by-line using this resolution.
use constant FILL_WIDTH => .01; #fill at most 0.01 inch at a time
# The max number of characters to read into memory
use constant MAX_BYTES => 10 * M; #bumped up to 10 MB, use const
use constant DUP_DRILL1 => TRUE; #FALSE; #kludge: ViewPlot doesn't load drill files that are too small so duplicate first tool
my $runtime = time(); #Time::HiRes::gettimeofday(); #measure my execution time
print STDERR "Loaded config settings from '${\(__FILE__)}'.\n";
1; #last value must be truthful to indicate successful load
#############################################################################################
#junk/experiment:
#use Package::Constants;
#use Exporter qw(import); #https://perldoc.perl.org/Exporter.html
#my $caller = "pdf2gerb::";
#sub cfg
#{
# my $proto = shift;
# my $class = ref($proto) || $proto;
# my $settings =
# {
# $WANT_DEBUG => 990, #10; #level of debug wanted; higher == more, lower == less, 0 == none
# };
# bless($settings, $class);
# return $settings;
#}
#use constant HELLO => "hi there2"; #"main::HELLO" => "hi there";
#use constant GOODBYE => 14; #"main::GOODBYE" => 12;
#print STDERR "read cfg file\n";
#our @EXPORT_OK = Package::Constants->list(__PACKAGE__); #https://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=1072691; NOTE: "_OK" skips short/common names
#print STDERR scalar(@EXPORT_OK) . " consts exported:\n";
#foreach(@EXPORT_OK) { print STDERR "$_\n"; }
#my $val = main::thing("xyz");
#print STDERR "caller gave me $val\n";
#foreach my $arg (@ARGV) { print STDERR "arg $arg\n"; }
Author: swannman
Source Code: https://github.com/swannman/pdf2gerb
License: GPL-3.0 license
1601341562
Bob had just arrived in the office for his first day of work as the newly hired chief technical officer when he was called into a conference room by the president, Martha, who immediately introduced him to the head of accounting, Amanda. They exchanged pleasantries, and then Martha got right down to business:
“Bob, we have several teams here developing software applications on Amazon and our bill is very high. We think it’s unnecessarily high, and we’d like you to look into it and bring it under control.”
Martha placed a screenshot of the Amazon Web Services (AWS) billing report on the table and pointed to it.
“This is a problem for us: We don’t know what we’re spending this money on, and we need to see more detail.”
Amanda chimed in, “Bob, look, we have financial dimensions that we use for reporting purposes, and I can provide you with some guidance regarding some information we’d really like to see such that the reports that are ultimately produced mirror these dimensions — if you can do this, it would really help us internally.”
“Bob, we can’t stress how important this is right now. These projects are becoming very expensive for our business,” Martha reiterated.
“How many projects do we have?” Bob inquired.
“We have four projects in total: two in the aviation division and two in the energy division. If it matters, the aviation division has 75 developers and the energy division has 25 developers,” the CEO responded.
Bob understood the problem and responded, “I’ll see what I can do and have some ideas. I might not be able to give you retrospective insight, but going forward, we should be able to get a better idea of what’s going on and start to bring the cost down.”
The meeting ended with Bob heading to find his desk. Cost allocation tags should help us, he thought to himself as he looked for someone who might know where his office is.
#aws #aws cloud #node js #cost optimization #aws cli #well architected framework #aws cost report #cost control #aws cost #aws tags
1659500100
Form objects decoupled from your models.
Reform gives you a form object with validations and nested setup of models. It is completely framework-agnostic and doesn't care about your database.
Although reform can be used in any Ruby framework, it comes with Rails support, works with simple_form and other form gems, allows nesting forms to implement has_one and has_many relationships, can compose a form from multiple objects and gives you coercion.
Reform is part of the Trailblazer framework. Full documentation is available on the project site.
Temporary note: Reform 2.2 does not automatically load Rails files anymore (e.g. ActiveModel::Validations
). You need the reform-rails
gem, see Installation.
Forms are defined in separate classes. Often, these classes partially map to a model.
class AlbumForm < Reform::Form
property :title
validates :title, presence: true
end
Fields are declared using ::property
. Validations work exactly as you know it from Rails or other frameworks. Note that validations no longer go into the model.
Forms have a ridiculously simple API with only a handful of public methods.
#initialize
always requires a model that the form represents.#validate(params)
updates the form's fields with the input data (only the form, not the model) and then runs all validations. The return value is the boolean result of the validations.#errors
returns validation messages in a classic ActiveModel style.#sync
writes form data back to the model. This will only use setter methods on the model(s).#save
(optional) will call #save
on the model and nested models. Note that this implies a #sync
call.#prepopulate!
(optional) will run pre-population hooks to "fill out" your form before rendering.In addition to the main API, forms expose accessors to the defined properties. This is used for rendering or manual operations.
In your controller or operation you create a form instance and pass in the models you want to work on.
class AlbumsController
def new
@form = AlbumForm.new(Album.new)
end
This will also work as an editing form with an existing album.
def edit
@form = AlbumForm.new(Album.find(1))
end
Reform will read property values from the model in setup. In our example, the AlbumForm
will call album.title
to populate the title
field.
Your @form
is now ready to be rendered, either do it yourself or use something like Rails' #form_for
, simple_form
or formtastic
.
= form_for @form do |f|
= f.input :title
Nested forms and collections can be easily rendered with fields_for
, etc. Note that you no longer pass the model to the form builder, but the Reform instance.
Optionally, you might want to use the #prepopulate!
method to pre-populate fields and prepare the form for rendering.
After form submission, you need to validate the input.
class SongsController
def create
@form = SongForm.new(Song.new)
#=> params: {song: {title: "Rio", length: "366"}}
if @form.validate(params[:song])
The #validate
method first updates the values of the form - the underlying model is still treated as immutuable and remains unchanged. It then runs all validations you provided in the form.
It's the only entry point for updating the form. This is per design, as separating writing and validation doesn't make sense for a form.
This allows rendering the form after validate
with the data that has been submitted. However, don't get confused, the model's values are still the old, original values and are only changed after a #save
or #sync
operation.
After validation, you have two choices: either call #save
and let Reform sort out the rest. Or call #sync
, which will write all the properties back to the model. In a nested form, this works recursively, of course.
It's then up to you what to do with the updated models - they're still unsaved.
The easiest way to save the data is to call #save
on the form.
if @form.validate(params[:song])
@form.save #=> populates album with incoming data
# by calling @form.album.title=.
else
# handle validation errors.
end
This will sync the data to the model and then call album.save
.
Sometimes, you need to do saving manually.
Reform allows default values to be provided for properties.
class AlbumForm < Reform::Form
property :price_in_cents, default: 9_95
end
Calling #save
with a block will provide a nested hash of the form's properties and values. This does not call #save
on the models and allows you to implement the saving yourself.
The block parameter is a nested hash of the form input.
@form.save do |hash|
hash #=> {title: "Greatest Hits"}
Album.create(hash)
end
You can always access the form's model. This is helpful when you were using populators to set up objects when validating.
@form.save do |hash|
album = @form.model
album.update_attributes(hash[:album])
end
Reform provides support for nested objects. Let's say the Album
model keeps some associations.
class Album < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :artist
has_many :songs
end
The implementation details do not really matter here, as long as your album exposes readers and writes like Album#artist
and Album#songs
, this allows you to define nested forms.
class AlbumForm < Reform::Form
property :title
validates :title, presence: true
property :artist do
property :full_name
validates :full_name, presence: true
end
collection :songs do
property :name
end
end
You can also reuse an existing form from elsewhere using :form
.
property :artist, form: ArtistForm
Reform will wrap defined nested objects in their own forms. This happens automatically when instantiating the form.
album.songs #=> [<Song name:"Run To The Hills">]
form = AlbumForm.new(album)
form.songs[0] #=> <SongForm model: <Song name:"Run To The Hills">>
form.songs[0].name #=> "Run To The Hills"
When rendering a nested form you can use the form's readers to access the nested forms.
= text_field :title, @form.title
= text_field "artist[name]", @form.artist.name
Or use something like #fields_for
in a Rails environment.
= form_for @form do |f|
= f.text_field :title
= f.fields_for :artist do |a|
= a.text_field :name
validate
will assign values to the nested forms. sync
and save
work analogue to the non-nested form, just in a recursive way.
The block form of #save
would give you the following data.
@form.save do |nested|
nested #=> {title: "Greatest Hits",
# artist: {name: "Duran Duran"},
# songs: [{title: "Hungry Like The Wolf"},
# {title: "Last Chance On The Stairways"}]
# }
end
The manual saving with block is not encouraged. You should rather check the Disposable docs to find out how to implement your manual tweak with the official API.
Very often, you need to give Reform some information how to create or find nested objects when validate
ing. This directive is called populator and documented here.
Add this line to your Gemfile:
gem "reform"
Reform works fine with Rails 3.1-5.0. However, inheritance of validations with ActiveModel::Validations
is broken in Rails 3.2 and 4.0.
Since Reform 2.2, you have to add the reform-rails
gem to your Gemfile
to automatically load ActiveModel/Rails files.
gem "reform-rails"
Since Reform 2.0 you need to specify which validation backend you want to use (unless you're in a Rails environment where ActiveModel will be used).
To use ActiveModel (not recommended because very out-dated).
require "reform/form/active_model/validations"
Reform::Form.class_eval do
include Reform::Form::ActiveModel::Validations
end
To use dry-validation (recommended).
require "reform/form/dry"
Reform::Form.class_eval do
feature Reform::Form::Dry
end
Put this in an initializer or on top of your script.
Reform allows to map multiple models to one form. The complete documentation is here, however, this is how it works.
class AlbumForm < Reform::Form
include Composition
property :id, on: :album
property :title, on: :album
property :songs, on: :cd
property :cd_id, on: :cd, from: :id
end
When initializing a composition, you have to pass a hash that contains the composees.
AlbumForm.new(album: album, cd: CD.find(1))
Reform comes many more optional features, like hash fields, coercion, virtual fields, and so on. Check the full documentation here.
Reform is part of the Trailblazer project. Please buy my book to support the development and learn everything about Reform - there's two chapters dedicated to Reform!
By explicitly defining the form layout using ::property
there is no more need for protecting from unwanted input. strong_parameter
or attr_accessible
become obsolete. Reform will simply ignore undefined incoming parameters.
Temporary note: This is the README and API for Reform 2. On the public API, only a few tiny things have changed. Here are the Reform 1.2 docs.
Anyway, please upgrade and report problems and do not simply assume that we will magically find out what needs to get fixed. When in trouble, join us on Gitter.
Full documentation for Reform is available online, or support us and grab the Trailblazer book. There is an Upgrading Guide to help you migrate through versions.
Great thanks to Blake Education for giving us the freedom and time to develop this project in 2013 while working on their project.
Author: trailblazer
Source code: https://github.com/trailblazer/reform
License: MIT license
1600596000
The adaptability and flexibility of today’s cloud services present a lot of opportunities to cut infrastructure costs. Amazon Web Services and its plethora of services let you set up any kind of cloud environment for any type of application, without forcing you to make long-term commitments. At the very least, you don’t have to make a big initial investment to set up your cloud environments.
AWS resources are designed to make deploying cloud-native applications easy and affordable. Affordability is always important for businesses because cost-efficient applications guarantee higher returns on cloud investment. The way AWS services are set up allows for easy scaling of apps and cloud resource usage, but keeping your cloud environment efficient is not without its challenges.
#aws #amazon web services #cost #cost optimization #cost analysis #cost management #cost analytics #aws costs
1619159965
Gathering and reviewing data to obtain useful insights into your organization and assess the performance of your processes is essential. When it comes to AWS savings, it’s necessary to calculate your AWS expense and utilization performance metrics. You should do this just like you measure your operational activities. As 35% of the cloud spend is wasted, organizations need to find more effective ways to make the most out of their AWS savings.
In the previous articles of this series, we discussed the most common challenges with AWS costs, listed three reasons why organizations need AWS cost optimization, and made a short introduction to FinOps. In this article, we suggest some cost management metrics that can help you track AWS savings more effectively. Moreover, you can use them as a tool to predict future performance and make cutting decisions.
#aws cost optimization #aws cost management #aws costs #aws savings #aws