Alice  Upton

Alice Upton

1597287720

AWS Elastic Load Balancing Introduction

Learn about Load Balancers, the servers that redirect traffic between Instances and Users!

#aws

What is GEEK

Buddha Community

AWS Elastic Load Balancing Introduction
Ida  Nader

Ida Nader

1602955980

Elastic Load Balancing

What is load balancing?

• Load balancers are servers that forward internet traffic to multiple server (EC2 Instances) downstream.

Image for post

Why use a load balancer?

  • Spread load across multiple downstream instances.
  • Expose a single point of access (DNS) to your application.
  • Seamlessly handle failures of downstream instances.
  • Do regular health checks to your instances.
  • → If one of them is failing then the load balancer will not direct traffic to the instance, so we can hide the failure of an EC2 instance using a load balancer.
  • Provide SSL termination (HTTPS) for your websites.
  • High availability across zones.

#aws #load-balancer #instance #elastic-load-balancer #data-engineer

Introducing AWS Gateway Load Balancer

Last year, we launched Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) Ingress Routing to allow routing of all incoming and outgoing traffic to/from an Internet Gateway (IGW) or Virtual Private Gateway (VGW) to the Elastic Network Interface of a specific Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) instance. With VPC Ingress Routing, you can now configure your VPC to send all traffic to an EC2 instance that typically runs network security tools to inspect or to block suspicious network traffic or to perform any other network traffic inspection before relaying the traffic to other EC2 instances.

While that makes it easy to add an appliance into the network, ensuring high availability and scalability remains a challenge. Customers have to either over-provision appliances to handle peak load and high availability, or they have to manually scale up and down the appliances based on traffic, or use other ancillary tools – all of which increases operational overhead and costs.

#aws marketplace #aws partner network #aws #aws gateway load balancer

AWS Application Load Balancer vs. NGINX Plus

In August 2016, Amazon Web Services (AWS) introduced Application Load Balancer for Layer 7 load balancing of HTTP and HTTPS traffic. The new product added several features missing from AWS’s existing Layer 4 and Layer 7 load balancer, Elastic Load Balancer, which was officially renamed Classic Load Balancer.

A year later, AWS launched Network Load Balancer for improved Layer 4 load balancing, so the set of choices for users running highly available, scalable applications on AWS includes:

In this post, we review ALB’s features and compare its pricing and features to NGINX Open Source and NGINX Plus.

Notes –

  • The information about supported features is accurate as of July 2020, but is subject to change.
  • For a direct comparison of NGINX Plus and Classic Load Balancer (formerly Elastic Load Balancer or ELB), as well as information on using them together, see our previous blog post.
  • For information on using NLB for a high‑availability NGINX Plus deployment, see our previous blog post.

Features In Application Load Balancer

ALB, like Classic Load Balancer or NLB, is tightly integrated into AWS. Amazon describes it as a Layer 7 load balancer – though it does not provide the full breadth of features, tuning, and direct control that a standalone Layer 7 reverse proxy and load balancer can offer.

ALB provides the following features that are missing from Classic Load Balancer:

  • Content‑based routing. ALB supports content‑based routing based on the request URL, Host header, and fields in the request that include standard and custom HTTP headers and methods, query parameters, and source IP address. (See “Benefits of migrating from a Classic Load Balancer” in the ALB documentation.)
  • Support for container‑based applications. ALB improves on the existing support for containers hosted on Amazon’s EC2 Container Service (ECS).
  • More metrics. You can collect metrics on a per‑microservice basis.
  • WebSocket support. ALB supports persistent TCP connections between a client and server.
  • HTTP/2 support. ALB supports HTTP/2, a superior alternative when delivering content secured by SSL/TLS.

(For a complete feature comparison of ALB and Classic Load Balancer, see “Product comparisons” in the AWS documentation.)

ALB was a significant update for AWS users who had struggled with Classic Load Balancer’s limited feature set, and it went some way towards addressing the requirements of sophisticated users who need to be able to secure, optimize, and control the traffic to their web applications. However, it still does not provide all the capabilities of dedicated reverse proxies (such as NGINX) and load balancers (such as NGINX Plus).

#load balancing #elastic load balancing (elb) #amazon web services #aws

野村  太郎

野村 太郎

1598062380

[アップデート] Network Load Balancer で TLS ALPN がサポートされたので HTTP/2 が可能になりました。

何が嬉しいのか

TLS リスナーで HTTP/2 が利用可能に

これまで NLB の TLS リスナーでは ALPN に対応していなかったため、HTTP/2 で受けることが出来ませんでした。そのため、NLB を介した HTTP/2 通信をするには TLS リスナーではなく TCP リスナーとして NLB を構成する必要がありました。

この場合、NLB は TCP パススルーとしてのみ機能しますので、TLS ネゴシエーションや、TLS の暗号化/復号といった処理は NLB のターゲットとなるサーバー側で行うこととなり、少なからず TLS 通信のための負荷が掛かることになります。

今回、gRPC は試していませんが、従来であれば以下の記事のように TCP リスナーとしてエンドツーエンドでの TLS ネゴシエーションだったところを、NLB の TLS リスナーで対応できるようになるかと思います。

ちなみに ALB の場合は、ALPN に対応していますが、ALB が HTTP/2 を HTTP/1.1 に変換してターゲットグループに流しますので、gRPC などは利用できません。

Application Load Balancer は、HTTPS リスナーに HTTP/2 のネイティブサポートを提供します。1 つの HTTP/2 コネクションで最大 128 のリクエストを並行して送信できます。ロードバランサーは、これらのリクエストを個々の HTTP/1.1 のリクエストに変換し、ターゲットグループの正常なターゲットにこれを分配します。

(引用:Application Load Balancer のリスナー)

TLS リスナーで終端は出来ない!?

今回のアップデートを見たとき、TLS リスナーで終端できるのだろうと思っていたのですが、ALPN ポリシーを利用する場合は、TLS リスナーに加えて TLS ターゲットグループが必須要件となっていますので、ターゲット側でも何らかの証明書が必要なようです。

#aws #aws elastic load balancing #network load balancer

Hal  Sauer

Hal Sauer

1593444960

Sample Load balancing solution with Docker and Nginx

Most of today’s business applications use load balancing to distribute traffic among different resources and avoid overload of a single resource.

One of the obvious advantages of load balancing architecture is to increase the availability and reliability of applications, so if a certain number of clients request some number of resources to backends, Load balancer stays between them and route the traffic to the backend that fills most the routing criteria (less busy, most healthy, located in a given region … etc).

There are a lot of routing criteria, but we will focus on this article on fixed round-robin criteria — meaning each backend receives a fixed amount of traffic — which I think rarely documented :).

To simplify we will create two backends “applications” based on flask Python files. We will use NGINX as a load balancer to distribute 60% of traffic to application1 and 40% of traffic to application2.

Let’s start the coding, hereafter the complete architecture of our project:

app1/app1.py

from flask import request, Flask
import json

app1 = Flask(__name__)
@app1.route('/')
def hello_world():
return 'Salam alikom, this is App1 :) '
if __name__ == '__main__':
app1.run(debug=True, host='0.0.0.0')

app2/app2.py

from flask import request, Flask
import json

app1 = Flask(__name__)
@app1.route('/')
def hello_world():
return 'Salam alikom, this is App2 :) '
if __name__ == '__main__':
app1.run(debug=True, host='0.0.0.0')

Then we have to dockerize both applications by adding the requirements.txt file. It will contain only the flask library since we are using the python3 image.

#load-balancing #python-flask #docker-load-balancing #nginx #flask-load-balancing