Can dynamic sites go Serverless? You can (and I did) deploy out of GitHub in a standard hosting pages. We're going to do how incremental builds, Lambda and Netlify's ease-of-use allowed one dev to migrate serverless dynamic sites to a microservices architecture on the Jamstack.
This is a contributed post by Moriel Schottlender. Moriel is a physicist turned software engineer turned systems architect, currently working on modernizing Wikipedia’s architecture. She’s an open source enthusiast, right-to-left language support evangelist, and a general domain hoarder. You can find her as @mooeypoo on Twitter, Polywork, and most other social platforms.
When a project at work came up that involved creating a quick UI prototype with a query to an external GraphQL service, I thought I’d give it a try with Netlify. The experience was life changing. Within 10 minutes of switching to Netlify, I had a working prototype with a CI pipeline, a 1-line definition that gave me an API proxy, and the ability to pre-test Pull Requests before merging. The gains of switching to the all-in-one service that Netlify offers were obvious, even with a really small prototype.
The idea of serverless for a tool that is mostly static content is appealing. Generating assets on build and treating the delivery of pages as a distributed CDN (generated on-build rather than on-request) means huge gains in performance for the client.
I was excited about the possibilities of migrating some personal projects to Netlify, saving myself the need (and hassle) of running them on shared- and virtual private servers, and reducing the mental and operational overhead that traditional web server operations entail.
But I wasn’t convinced my use case was a valid one for migration.
The projects I wanted to migrate to a serverless architecture are dynamic tools, not blogs or fairly static pages, and they’re not relying on constant updates. The majority of the tools I build and host are one-offs that generate content on demand depending on some user input, so on-build generation isn’t really an advantage for me. On top of that, my tools are usually ones where I build often during the development phase, but then, once they reach stability, they basically stay as-is, untouched except for rare bug fixes and maintenance.
These factors made the two main advantages of Netlify that I had experienced with my work project — generation on-build and continuous CI — potentially irrelevant for my use case.
So, should I migrate at all?
Businesses need to understand serverless application with major pros and cons of serverless architecture, before deciding about serverless computing.
Bypass the complex middleware and consider a lightweight node.js implementation to deploy serverless functions from your mainframe CICS applications.
Happy Serverless September 2020! We at Coding Sans love working with serverless technology. This is why we decided to publish a report with the latest serverless trends this year. We partnered up with nine other companies who share our love to make it happen.
In this post, I will go through the process of predicting key performance characteristics and the cost of scale-per-request serverless platforms (like AWS Lambda, IBM Cloud Functions, Azure Functions, and Google Cloud Functions) with different workload intensities (in terms of requests per second) using a performance model.
Serverless computing promises greater scalability, faster development, more efficient deployment, and lower cost.