An important feature available in Azure Data Factory is the git integration, which allows us to keep Azure Data Factory artifacts under Source Control. This is a mandatory step to achieve Continuous Integration and Delivery later on, so why not configure this using Infrastructure as Code with Bicep in a fully automated way?
In the official Microsoft documentation there is a good topic explaining how to integrate Azure Data Factory with git, but through the Azure Portal. In this post, I will explain how to do that using Bicep, the new IaC language for Azure, to make it possible to include this step into your CI/CD process, and also how to deploy only on needed environments.
If you accumulate data on which you base your decision-making as an organization, you should probably think about your data architecture and possible best practices.
If you accumulate data on which you base your decision-making as an organization, you most probably need to think about your data architecture and consider possible best practices. Gaining a competitive edge, remaining customer-centric to the greatest extent possible, and streamlining processes to get on-the-button outcomes can all be traced back to an organization’s capacity to build a future-ready data architecture.
In what follows, we offer a short overview of the overarching capabilities of data architecture. These include user-centricity, elasticity, robustness, and the capacity to ensure the seamless flow of data at all times. Added to these are automation enablement, plus security and data governance considerations. These points from our checklist for what we perceive to be an anticipatory analytics ecosystem.
#big data #data science #big data analytics #data analysis #data architecture #data transformation #data platform #data strategy #cloud data platform #data acquisition
The impulse to cut project costs is often strong, especially in the final delivery phase of data integration and data migration projects. At this late phase of the project, a common mistake is to delegate testing responsibilities to resources with limited business and data testing skills.
Data integrations are at the core of data warehousing, data migration, data synchronization, and data consolidation projects.
In the past, most data integration projects involved data stored in databases. Today, it’s essential for organizations to also integrate their database or structured data with data from documents, e-mails, log files, websites, social media, audio, and video files.
Using data warehousing as an example, Figure 1 illustrates the primary checkpoints (testing points) in an end-to-end data quality testing process. Shown are points at which data (as it’s extracted, transformed, aggregated, consolidated, etc.) should be verified – that is, extracting source data, transforming source data for loads into target databases, aggregating data for loads into data marts, and more.
Only after data owners and all other stakeholders confirm that data integration was successful can the whole process be considered complete and ready for production.
#big data #data integration #data governance #data validation #data accuracy #data warehouse testing #etl testing #data integrations
So after a long break (caused by a combination of laziness and actually being busy), I’m attempting to get back into creating more video content.
In this video, I’m using Bicep to deploy Azure Data Factory! Bicep is Domain Specific Language for deploying resources to Azure and is a HUGE improvement over ARM templates.
I’ve been trying to learn Bicep for my new job. Usually when it comes to Infrastructure code, I’d opt for Terraform since that’s the first IaC tool I learnt. In my new role, I’m using ARM a lot more.
To be honest, I never really liked ARM. Messing about with JSON files wasn’t my idea of fun, so when I first saw Bicep I was keen to give it a go.
#cloud-computing #data #azure #bicep #azure data factory #deploying
Data integration solutions typically advocate that one approach – either ETL or ELT – is better than the other. In reality, both ETL (extract, transform, load) and ELT (extract, load, transform) serve indispensable roles in the data integration space:
Because ETL and ELT present different strengths and weaknesses, many organizations are using a hybrid “ETLT” approach to get the best of both worlds. In this guide, we’ll help you understand the “why, what, and how” of ETLT, so you can determine if it’s right for your use-case.
#data science #data #data security #data integration #etl #data warehouse #data breach #elt #bid data
The opportunities big data offers also come with very real challenges that many organizations are facing today. Often, it’s finding the most cost-effective, scalable way to store and process boundless volumes of data in multiple formats that come from a growing number of sources. Then organizations need the analytical capabilities and flexibility to turn this data into insights that can meet their specific business objectives.
This Refcard dives into how a data lake helps tackle these challenges at both ends — from its enhanced architecture that’s designed for efficient data ingestion, storage, and management to its advanced analytics functionality and performance flexibility. You’ll also explore key benefits and common use cases.
As technology continues to evolve with new data sources, such as IoT sensors and social media churning out large volumes of data, there has never been a better time to discuss the possibilities and challenges of managing such data for varying analytical insights. In this Refcard, we dig deep into how data lakes solve the problem of storing and processing enormous amounts of data. While doing so, we also explore the benefits of data lakes, their use cases, and how they differ from data warehouses (DWHs).
This is a preview of the Getting Started With Data Lakes Refcard. To read the entire Refcard, please download the PDF from the link above.
#big data #data analytics #data analysis #business analytics #data warehouse #data storage #data lake #data lake architecture #data lake governance #data lake management