Cloud-to-Cloud integration is part of a <a href="https://www.voxxed.com/blog/2016/08/the-need-for-a-hybrid-integration-architecture/" target="_blank">hybrid integration architecture</a>. It enables to <strong>implement quick and agile integration scenarios</strong> without the burden of setting up complex VM- or container-based infrastructures. One key use case for cloud-to-cloud integration is innovation using a fail-fast methodology where you realize new ideas quickly. You typically think in days or weeks, not in months. <strong>If an idea fails, you throw it away and start another new idea.</strong> If the idea works well, you scale it out and bring it into production to a on premise, cloud or hybrid infrastructure. Finally, you make expose the idea and make it easily available to any interested service consumer in your enterprise, partners or public end users.
Cloud-to-Cloud integration is part of a hybrid integration architecture. It enables to implement quick and agile integration scenarios without the burden of setting up complex VM- or container-based infrastructures. One key use case for cloud-to-cloud integration is innovation using a fail-fast methodology where you realize new ideas quickly. You typically think in days or weeks, not in months. If an idea fails, you throw it away and start another new idea. If the idea works well, you scale it out and bring it into production to a on premise, cloud or hybrid infrastructure. Finally, you make expose the idea and make it easily available to any interested service consumer in your enterprise, partners or public end users.
A great example where you need agile, fail-fast development is blockchain because it is a very hot topic, but frameworks are immature and change very frequently these days. Note that blockchain is not just about Bitcoin and finance industry. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Blockchain, which is the underlying infrastructure of Bitcoin, will change various industries, beginning with banking, manufacturing, supply chain management, energy, and others.
Middleware and Integration as Key for Success in Blockchain Projects
A key for successful blockchain projects is middleware as it allows integration with the rest of an enterprise architecture. Blockchain only adds value if it works together with your other applications and services. See an example of how to combine streaming analytics with TIBCO StreamBase and Ethereum to correlate blockchain events in real time to act proactively, e.g. for fraud detection.
The drawback of blockchain is its immaturity today. APIs change with every minor release, development tools are buggy and miss many required features for serious development, and new blockchain cloud services, frameworks and programming languages come and go every quarter.
This blog post shows how to leverage cloud integration with iPaaS and API Management to realize innovative projects quickly, fail fast, and adopt changing technologies and business requirements easily. We will use TIBCO Cloud Integration (TCI), TIBCO Mashery and Hyperledger Fabric running as IBM Bluemix cloud service.
Hyperledger is a vendor independent open source blockchain project which consists of various components. Many enterprises and software vendors committed to it for building different solutions for various problems and use cases. One example is IBM’s Hyperledger Fabric. The benefit of being a very flexible construction kit makes Hyperledger much more complex for getting started than other blockchain platforms, like Ethereum, which are less flexible but therefore easier to set up and use.
This is the reason why I use the BlueMix BaaS (Blockchain as a Service) to get started quickly without spending days on just setting up my own Hyperledger network. You can start a Hyperledger Fabric blockchain infrastructure with four peers and a membership service with just a few clicks. It takes around two minutes. Hyperledger Fabric is evolving fast. Therefore, a great example for quickly changing features, evolving requirements and (potentially) fast failing projects.
My project uses version Hyperledger Fabric 0.6 as free beta cloud service. I leverage its Swagger-based REST API in my middleware microservice to interconnect other cloud services with the blockchain:
However, when I began the project, it was already clear that the REST interface is deprecated and will not be included in the upcoming 1.0 release anymore. Thus, we are aware that an easy move to another API is needed in a few weeks or months.
As mentioned in the introduction, middleware is key for success in blockchain projects to interconnect it with the existing enterprise architecture. This example leverages the following middleware components:
I implemented the following technical scenario with the goal of showing agile cloud-to-cloud integration with fail-fast methodology from a technical perspective (and not to build a great business case): The scenario implements a new REST microservice with TCI via visual coding and configuration. This REST service connects to two cloud services: Salesforce and Hyperledger Fabric. The following picture shows the architecture:
Here are the steps to realize this scenario:
This section discusses the relevant steps of the implementation in more detail, including development and deployment of the chain code (Hyperledger’s term for smart contracts in blockchain), implementation of the REST integration service with visual coding in the IDE of TCI, and exposing the service as API via TIBCO Mashery.
Chain Code for Hyperledger Fabric on IBM Bluemix Cloud
Hyperledger Fabric has some detailed “getting started” tutorials. I used a “Hello World” Tutorial and adopted it to our use case so that you can store, update and query customer data on the blockchain network. Hyperledger Fabric uses Go for chain code and will allow other programming languages like Java in future releases. This is both a pro and con. The benefit is that you can leverage your existing expertise in these programming languages. However, you also have to be careful not to use “wrong” features like threads, indefinite loops or other functions which cause unexpected behavior on a blockchain. Personally, I prefer the concept of Ethereum. This platform uses Solidity, a programming language explicitly designed to develop smart contracts (i.e. chain code).
Cloud-to-Cloud Integration via REST Service with TIBCO Cloud Integration
The following steps were necessary to implement the REST microservice:
The last point is very important in blockchain projects. A blockchain infrastructure does not have millisecond response latency. Furthermore, every blockchain update costs money – Bitcoin, Ether, or whatever currency you use to “pay for mining” and to reach consensus in your blockchain infrastructure. Therefore, you can leverage caching and throttling in blockchain projects much more than in some other projects (only if it fits into your business scenario, of course).
Here is the implemented REST service in TCI’s graphical development environment:
And the caching configuration in TCI’s web user interface:
Exposing the REST Service to Service Consumers through API Management via TIBCO Mashery
The deployed TCI microservice can either be accessed directly by service consumers or you expose it via API Management, e.g. with TIBCO Mashery. The latter option allows to define rules, payment plans and security configuration in a centralized manner with easy-to-use tooling.
Note that the deployment to TCI and exposing its API to Mashery can also be done in one single step. Both products are loosely coupled, but highly integrated. Also note that this is typically not done manually (like in this technical demonstration), but integrated into a DevOps infrastructure leveraging frameworks like Maven or Jenkins to automate the deployment and testing steps.
Agile Cloud-to-Cloud Integration with Fail-Fast Methodology
Our scenario is now implemented successfully. However, it is already clear that the REST interface is deprecated and not included in the upcoming 1.0 release anymore. In blockchain frameworks, you can expect changes very frequently.
While implementing this example, IBM announced on its big user conference IBM Interconnect in Las Vegas that Hyperledger Fabric 1.0 is now publicly available. Well, it is really available on Bluemix since that day, but if you try to start the service you get the following message: “Due to high demand of our limited beta, we have reached capacity.” A strange error as I thought we are using public cloud infrastructures like Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform or IBM Bluemix for exactly this reason to scale out easily… J
This blog post focuses just on a small example, and Hyperledger Fabric 1.0 will bring other new features and concept changes with it, of course. Same is true for SaaS cloud offerings such as Salesforce. You cannot control when they change their API and what exactly they change. But you have to adopt it within a relative short timeframe or your service will not work anymore. An iPaaS is the perfect solution for these scenarios as you do not have a lot of complex setup in your private data center or a public cloud platform. You just use it “as a service”, change it, replace logic, or stop it and throw it away to start a new project. The implicit integration into API Management and DevOps support also allow to expose new versions for your service consumers easily and quickly.
Blockchain is very early stage. This is true for platforms, tooling, and even the basic concepts and theories (like consensus algorithms or security enforcement). Don’t trust the vendors if they say Blockchain is now 1.0 and ready for prime time. It will still feel more like a 0.5 beta version these days. This is not just true for Hyperledger and its related projects such as IBM’s Hyperledger Fabric, but also for all others, including Ethereum and all the interesting frameworks and startups emerging around it.
Therefore, you need to be flexible and agile in blockchain development today. You need to be able to fail fast. This means set up a project quickly, try out new innovative ideas, and throw them away if they do not work; to start the next one. The same is true for other innovative ideas – not just for blockchain.
Can I write on a Bitcoin Blockchain? Can I drop down a message? Yes, Luca of course you can! You can leave a message on a Bitcoin blockchain using a particular op code, called OP_RETURN.
Get hands on experinece on block chain live industry experts with real world example at Block chain online Training. Enroll for free demo
Few people ask me about the social, political, and economic impact of cryptographically-secure, time-stamped distributed ledgers. Most people ask “should I buy bitcoin?” They seem interested in whether they can make money from its price going up.
If you have been following banking, investing, or cryptocurrency over the last ten years, you may be familiar with “blockchain,” the record-keeping technology behind the Bitcoin network. And there’s a good chance that it only makes so much sense. In trying to learn more about blockchain, you’ve probably encountered words like this: “blockchain is a distributed, decentralized, public ledger.” The good news is that blockchain is actually easier to understand than that definition sounds.
Learn how Bitcoin works and how the “blockchain” tech behind it can be used to produce business value beyond digital currencies.