Researchers making a racket about the paper review process have become a common sight at academic conferences. The old chestnuts being: How do reviewers judge the novelty of a paper? How did a similar work get better reviews? Given the low acceptance rates and highly coveted conferences, the researchers can be incentivised to pursue unethical practices. The situation got so bad that the Association for Computing Machinery(ACM) had to make a statement.

Read more: https://analyticsindiamag.com/whats-wrong-with-the-paper-review-process-of-reputed-ml-conferences/

#ml

What’s Wrong With Paper Review Process Of Reputed ML Conferences?
1.10 GEEK