The battle of CI/CD tools rages on — come and find out which is the right tool for your DevOps testing needs.
For the last decade or so, great advancement has been made in regards to Continuous Integration (CI) and Continuous Delivery (CD). The rise of DevOps testing has led to rapid demand for CI/CD tools. Existing solutions are consistently perking up with time and a myriad of new products or new versions are making their entrance into the QA world. When you have such prolific choices at hand, selecting the right tool can definitely get a little intimidating.
Amongst all the available CI/CD tools for testing, two tools that you should certainly consider are Jenkins and GitLab CI/CD. Jenkins has 16,000+ stars on GitHub whereas GitLab CI/CD has 2012. That’s 8 times more than GitLab CI/CD. However, these numbers aren’t the only thing one needs to look into while selecting a CI/CD tool. This is why in spite of the immense difference in stars, Jenkins vs GitLab CI/CD is having a neck to neck race over multiple review platforms as well.
Take G2 for instance, Jenkins has an average rating of 4.3 stars on G2 with 288 reviews while GitLab CI/CD has received 4.4 stars with 270 reviews on G2. It wouldn’t be wrong to claim that Jenkins vs Gitlab CI/CD is competing with each other on an equal footing. Interestingly, Jenkins was released in 2011 and is in the CI/CD business, it has been the preferred choice for testers. Yet ever since its launch in 2014, GitLab CI/CD has been making its way to the top with cutting edge features. We conducted a poll on social media as we went live with an article on Travis CI vs Jenkins.
The other tool that was mentioned the most was GitLab CI/CD. As a DevOps testing expert, you need to scrutinize these tools based on your project, budget, and other requirements. To help you out, I am going to do an in-depth evaluation of Jenkins vs GitLab CI/CD to help you make up your mind about the right CI/CD tool meeting your project requirements. Let’s start off with the basics.
#devops #jenkins #gitlab #testing
