A lot of web development is transforming JSON one way or another. In TypeScript/JavaScript this is straightforward, since JSON is built into the language. But can we also achieve good ergonomics in Haskell and Rust?
The comparisons we will see is not meant to show if one approach is better than another. Instead, it is intended to be a reference to become familiar with common patterns across multiple languages. Throughout this post we will utilize several tools and libraries.
The core of working with JSON in Haskell and Rust is covered by:
The ergonomics is then improved in Haskell by grabbing one of the following options
We’ll go through typical use-cases seen in TypeScript/JavaScript codebases, and see how we can achieve the same in Haskell and Rust.
Table of Contents:
First we will setup our data structures and a few examples, which we will use throughout this post. Haskell and Rust requires a bit more ceremony, because we will use packages/crates. For TypeScript we use ts-node
to run TypeScript in a REPL.
TypeScript
Let us first set up our reference Object in TypeScript. Save the following in house.ts
(or check out typescript-json):
interface Address {
country: string;
address: string;
}
interface Person {
id: number;
firstname: string;
lastname: string;
}
interface Household {
id: number;
people: Person[];
address?: Address;
alternativeAddress?: Address;
owner: Person;
}
const addr: Address = { country: "Ocean", address: "Under the sea" };
const mom: Person = { id: 1, firstname: "Ariel", lastname: "Swanson" };
const dad: Person = { id: 2, firstname: "Triton", lastname: "Swanson" };
const son: Person = { id: 3, firstname: "Eric", lastname: "Swanson" };
const house: Household = {
id: 1,
people: [mom, dad, son],
address: addr,
// We omit `alternativeAddress` which is optional.
owner: mom,
};
Haskell
The included snippet serves to give you an idea of the datastructures, types, and names that we will be working with.
The setups for each specific solution can be found in:
Check out src/House.hs
for the data structures, and src/Main.hs
for all the examples throughout this post.
data Address = Address
{ country :: String
, address :: String
}
data Person = Person
{ id :: Int
, firstname :: String
, lastname :: String
}
data Household = Household
{ id :: Int
, people :: [Person]
, address :: Maybe Address
, alternativeAddress :: Maybe Address
, owner :: Person
}
house = Household
{ id = 1
, people = [mom, dad, son]
, address = Just addr
, alternativeAddress = Nothing
, owner = mom
}
where
addr = Address { country = "Ocean", address = "Under the sea" }
mom = Person { id = 1, firstname = "Ariel", lastname = "Swanson" }
dad = Person { id = 2, firstname = "Triton", lastname = "Swanson" }
son = Person { id = 3, firstname = "Eric", lastname = "Swanson" }
To allow overlapping record fields, we use DuplicateRecordFields along with OverloadedLabels (only in the Lens version), and a bunch of other extensions for deriving things via generics.
Rust
The full setup can be found in rust-serde. Check out src/house.rs
for the data structures, and src/main.rs
for all the examples throughout this post.
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone)]
pub struct Address {
pub country: String,
pub address: String,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone)]
pub struct Person {
pub id: u32,
pub firstname: String,
pub lastname: String,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct Household {
pub id: u32,
pub people: Vec<Person>,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub address: Option<Address>,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub alternative_address: Option<Address>,
pub owner: Person
}
pub fn house() -> Household {
let addr = Address { country: "Ocean".to_string(), address: "Under the sea".to_string() };
let mom = Person { id: 1, firstname: "Ariel".to_string(), lastname: "Swanson".to_string() };
let dad = Person { id: 2, firstname: "Triton".to_string(), lastname: "Swanson".to_string() };
let son = Person { id: 3, firstname: "Eric".to_string(), lastname: "Swanson".to_string() };
Household {
id: 1,
people: vec![mom.clone(), dad, son],
address: Some(addr),
alternative_address: None,
owner: mom
}
}
If you wish to following along, you can fire up a REPL for each approach.
💡 For the TypeScript and Rust versions, where we utilize mutability, we will clone the objects each time, to keep them consistent across examples.
TypeScript
$ cd typescript-json
$ npm i
$ npm run repl
> import data from './house'
> let newData
Haskell
$ cd haskell-lens
$ stack build
$ stack ghci
*Main Data>
Unfortunately GHC plugins doesn’t play nicely with ghci
. We will instead build the project, so we can play around with the examples in src/Main.hs
.
$ cd haskell-record-dot
$ stack build
$ # Open src/Main.hs in your editor
$ stack run
Rust
Since Rust doesn’t have a REPL, we will instead build the project, so we play around with the examples in src/main.rs
.
$ cd rust-serde
$ cargo build
$ # Open src/main.rs in your editor
$ cargo run
The first one is simple, we will get a value from our object.
First, our TypeScript version:
> data.house.owner
{ id: 1, firstname: 'Ariel', lastname: 'Swanson' }
Let’s see how we achieve this in Haskell with Lenses:
*Main Data> house ^. #owner
Person {id = 1, firstname = "Ariel", lastname = "Swanson"}
There’s probably already two unfamiliar pieces of syntax here.
The first, ^.
, comes from Lens and is the view
function that we use as an accessor to the object/record. The second, the #
prefix of #owner
, comes from the OverloadedLabels
extension, and allows us to have multiple record fields of the same name in scope.
Let’s see how we achieve this in Haskell with Record Dot Syntax:
house.owner
--> Person {id = 1, firstname = "Ariel", lastname = "Swanson"}
Finally, let’s check out Rust:
house.owner
--> Person { id: 1, firstname: "Ariel", lastname: "Swanson" }
We slowly increase the difficulty, by accessing a nested field.
TypeScript:
> data.house.owner.firstname
'Ariel'
Haskell with Lenses:
*Main Data> house ^. #owner . #firstname
"Ariel"
Haskell with Record Dot Syntax:
house.owner.firstname
--> "Ariel"
Rust:
house.owner.firstname
--> "Ariel"
How do we handle optional fields?
TypeScript:
// A field that exists.
> data.house.address.address
'Under the sea'
// A field that does *NOT* exist (throws exception.)
> data.house.alternativeAddress.address
TypeError: Cannot read property 'address' of undefined
at ....
// A field that does *NOT* exist, using optional-chaining.
> data.house.alternativeAddress?.address
undefined
Optional chaining (?
) is a great step forward for writing safer and cleaner code in JS/TS.
Haskell with Lenses:
-- Return the value in a Maybe.
*Main Data> house ^. #address
Just (Address {country = "Ocean", address = "Under the sea"})
-- A field on an object that exists.
*Main Data> house ^. #address . #_Just . #address
"Under the sea"
-- A field on an object that does *NOT* exist (falls back to an empty value.)
*Main Data> house ^. #alternativeAddress . #_Just . #address
""
#_Just
from Lens gives us handy access to fields wrapped in Maybe
s, with a fallback value.
Haskell with Record Dot Syntax:
-- Return the value in a Maybe.
house.address
--> Just (Address {country = "Ocean", address = "Under the sea"})
-- A field on an object that exists.
maybe "" (.address) house.address
--> "Under the sea"
-- A field on an object that does *NOT* exist (falls back to an empty value.)
maybe "" (.address) house.alternativeAddress
--> ""
We end up writing more regular code to dive into the Maybe
value, by using maybe
5 to proceed or fallback to a default value.
Rust:
// Return the value in an Option.
house.address
--> Some(Address { country: "Ocean", address: "Under the sea" })
// A field on an object that exists.
house.address.and_then(|a| Some(a.address)).unwrap_or("".to_string())
--> "Under the sea"
// A field on an object that does *NOT* exist (falls back to an empty value.)
house.alternative_address.and_then(|a| Some(a.address)).unwrap_or("".to_string())
--> ""
We utilize and_then
a bit like maybe
, passing a function to act on our value if it’s Some
, and then creating a default case with unwrap_or
.
We’ll start with updating a non-nested field.
TypeScript:
> newData = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(data)) // Clone our data object.
> const newAriel = { id: 4, firstname: 'New Ariel', lastname: 'Swandóttir' }
> newData.house.owner = newAriel
{ id: 4, firstname: 'New Ariel', lastname: 'Swandóttir' }
Haskell with Lenses:
*Main Data> let newAriel = Person { id = 4, firstname = "New Ariel", lastname = "Swanson" }
*Main Data> house & #owner .~ newAriel
Household { {- Full Household object... -} }
We add two new pieces of syntax here. The &
is a reverse application operator, but for all intents and purposes think of it as the ^.
for setters. Finally, .~
is what allows us to actually set our value.
Haskell with Record Dot Syntax:
let newAriel = Person { id = 4, firstname = "New Ariel", lastname = "Swanson" }
house{ owner = newAriel}
--> Household { {- Full Household object... -} }
Pretty neat. Note that the lack of spacing in house{
is intentional.
Rust:
let mut new_house = house.clone();
let new_ariel = Person { id: 4, firstname: "New Ariel".to_string(), lastname: "Swanson".to_string() };
new_house.owner = new_ariel;
--> Household { /* Full Household object... */ }
We use Rust’s Struct Update syntax, ..
, which works much like the spread syntax (...
) in JavaScript.
Now it gets a bit more tricky.
TypeScript:
> newData = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(data)) // Clone our data object.
> newData.house.owner.firstname = 'New Ariel'
'New Ariel'
Haskell with Lenses:
*Main Data> house & #owner . #firstname .~ "New Ariel"
Household { {- Full Household object... -} }
Note that we mix &
and .
to dig deeper in the object/record, much like accessing a nested field.
Haskell with Record Dot Syntax:
house{ owner.firstname = "New Ariel"}
--> Household { {- Full Household object... -} }
Note that the lack of spacing in house{
is actually important, at least in the current state of RecordDotSyntax.
Rust:
let mut new_house = house.clone();
new_house.owner.firstname = "New Ariel".to_string();
--> Household { /* Full Household object... */ }
Let’s work a bit on the people list in our household. We’ll make those first names a bit more fresh.
TypeScript:
> newData = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(data)) // Clone our data object.
> newData.house.people.forEach(person => { person.firstname = `Fly ${person.firstname}` })
> newData.house.people
[
{ id: 1, firstname: 'Fly Ariel', lastname: 'Swanson' },
{ id: 2, firstname: 'Fly Triton', lastname: 'Swanson' },
{ id: 3, firstname: 'Fly Eric', lastname: 'Swanson' }
]
Haskell with Lenses:
-- You can usually also use `traverse` instead of `mapped` here.
*Main Data> house & #people . mapped . #firstname %~ ("Fly " <>)
Household { {- Full Household object... -} }
mapped
allows us to map a function over all the values in #people
.
Haskell with Record Dot Syntax:
house{ people = map (\p -> p{firstname = "Fly " ++ p.firstname}) house.people}
--> Household { {- Full Household object... -} }
Using map
feels very natural, and is quite close to the regular code you would write in Haskell.
Rust:
let mut new_house = house.clone();
new_house.people.iter_mut().for_each(|p| p.firstname = format!("Fly {}", p.firstname));
--> Household { /* Full Household object... */ }
Have other common patterns you’d like to see? Feel like some of the approaches could be improved? Leave a comment, and I will try to expand this list to be more comprehensive!
Originally published at https://codetalk.io
#json #haskell #rust #typescript #javascript